Who bears the brunt? Distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies


Buchs, Milena, Bardsley, Nicholas and Duwe, Sebastian (2011) Who bears the brunt? Distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies Critical Social Policy, 31, (2), pp. 285-307. (doi:10.1177/0261018310396036).

Download

[img] PDF CSP396036_proofs_24_jan_2011.pdf - Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (264kB)

Description/Abstract

Climate change scholars generally urge that CO2 emissions need to be cut rapidly if we are to avoid dangerous risks of climate change. However, climate change mitigation policies are widely perceived to have regressive effects – that is, putting a higher financial burden as a proportion of household income on poor than on rich households. This is one of several major barriers to the adoption of effective mitigation policies. They would also have considerable social justice implications requiring significant welfare state responses. We assess the claim that climate change policies have regressive effects by comparing different types of mitigation policies. We will argue that many of these are indeed likely to have regressive distributional implications but that there are several policy options to counteract regressive effects.

Item Type: Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1177/0261018310396036
ISSNs: 0261-0183 (print)
Subjects:

ePrint ID: 183577
Date :
Date Event
16 February 2011Published
Date Deposited: 03 May 2011 12:37
Last Modified: 18 Apr 2017 02:22
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/183577

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item