Disability and quality of life in spina bifida and hydrocephalus
Disability and quality of life in spina bifida and hydrocephalus
This study examined the impact of severity and type of condition and family resources on quality of life in children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. A national UK sample of children aged between 6 and 13 years with spina bifida (n=62), hydrocephalus (n=354), and spina bifida plus hydrocephalus (n=128) were identified via the register of the Association for Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus (ASBAH). Parents completed standardized measures of Child Health Related Quality Of Life (CQOL), family needs survey (FNS), and caregiving self-efficacy scale (CSES) as well as questions on children's health and physical ability. Results showed there were no significant differences in the overall quality of life for the three disability conditions. The overall CQOL was over 1 SD lower for those with spina bifida and hydrocephalus than for children with other physical conditions. Sex and age were not related to overall CQOL. Specific aspects of CQOL differentiated the three groups. Children with spina bifida had poorer CQOL scores on self-care, continence, and mobility/activities whilst those with hydrocephalus had poorer scores on school activities, worries, sight, and communication. Severity of condition and family resources, i.e. CSES and FNS, predicted 32% of the variance in CQOL. Associations were also found between overall CQOL and problems discernible at birth as well as epilepsy. Other factors, including those related to shunts, were not significantly related to CQOL. It was concluded that hydrocephalus is just as great a threat to CQOL as spina bifida. Beyond the general effect of condition severity on CQOL, family resources (as measured by the CSES and FNS) represent an additional influence on CQOL.
317-322
Pit-ten Cate, Ineke M.
0b59b1db-965e-4192-aec7-104c9f9e3765
Kennedy, Colin
7c3aff62-0a86-4b44-b7d7-4bc01f23ec93
Stevenson, Jim
0c85d29b-d294-43cb-ab8d-75e4737478e1
2002
Pit-ten Cate, Ineke M.
0b59b1db-965e-4192-aec7-104c9f9e3765
Kennedy, Colin
7c3aff62-0a86-4b44-b7d7-4bc01f23ec93
Stevenson, Jim
0c85d29b-d294-43cb-ab8d-75e4737478e1
Pit-ten Cate, Ineke M., Kennedy, Colin and Stevenson, Jim
(2002)
Disability and quality of life in spina bifida and hydrocephalus.
Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 44 (5), .
(doi:10.1017/S0012162201002146).
Abstract
This study examined the impact of severity and type of condition and family resources on quality of life in children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. A national UK sample of children aged between 6 and 13 years with spina bifida (n=62), hydrocephalus (n=354), and spina bifida plus hydrocephalus (n=128) were identified via the register of the Association for Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus (ASBAH). Parents completed standardized measures of Child Health Related Quality Of Life (CQOL), family needs survey (FNS), and caregiving self-efficacy scale (CSES) as well as questions on children's health and physical ability. Results showed there were no significant differences in the overall quality of life for the three disability conditions. The overall CQOL was over 1 SD lower for those with spina bifida and hydrocephalus than for children with other physical conditions. Sex and age were not related to overall CQOL. Specific aspects of CQOL differentiated the three groups. Children with spina bifida had poorer CQOL scores on self-care, continence, and mobility/activities whilst those with hydrocephalus had poorer scores on school activities, worries, sight, and communication. Severity of condition and family resources, i.e. CSES and FNS, predicted 32% of the variance in CQOL. Associations were also found between overall CQOL and problems discernible at birth as well as epilepsy. Other factors, including those related to shunts, were not significantly related to CQOL. It was concluded that hydrocephalus is just as great a threat to CQOL as spina bifida. Beyond the general effect of condition severity on CQOL, family resources (as measured by the CSES and FNS) represent an additional influence on CQOL.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2002
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 18362
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18362
ISSN: 0012-1622
PURE UUID: 1929596e-a2b3-48d2-bdb5-fcb544cb2160
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Jan 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Ineke M. Pit-ten Cate
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics