The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Anxiety and surgical recovery: reinterpreting the literature

Anxiety and surgical recovery: reinterpreting the literature
Anxiety and surgical recovery: reinterpreting the literature
OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate the interpretation of the findings reported in the peer-reviewed literature concerning the association of state and trait anxiety with surgical recovery and response to surgery.
METHODS: The Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), Science Citation Index (SCI), Medline and Psychological Abstracts (PsycInfo) databases were searched for studies published since 1981. Reference lists from previous reviews were also searched for additional references. Studies that were not in the public domain were not searched for.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were identified by the search strategy, met the inclusion criteria and contributed to the review.
CONCLUSIONS: Associations between preoperative measures of anxiety and postoperative mood and pain have been consistently reported. Associations with regard to other recovery variables are less consistent. The existing evidence does not rule out an interpretation of the results as reflecting consistent self-reporting bias rather than causal association.
mood disorder, human, cognition, personality, coping, cognitive style, depression, anxiety, cure, recovery, prediction, pain, stress, trauma, surgery, review
0022-3999
589-596
Munafò, Marcus R.
a3da5a94-337f-4ac9-bae9-8473f5278d52
Stevenson, Jim
0c85d29b-d294-43cb-ab8d-75e4737478e1
Munafò, Marcus R.
a3da5a94-337f-4ac9-bae9-8473f5278d52
Stevenson, Jim
0c85d29b-d294-43cb-ab8d-75e4737478e1

Munafò, Marcus R. and Stevenson, Jim (2001) Anxiety and surgical recovery: reinterpreting the literature. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 51 (4), 589-596. (doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00258-6).

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate the interpretation of the findings reported in the peer-reviewed literature concerning the association of state and trait anxiety with surgical recovery and response to surgery.
METHODS: The Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), Science Citation Index (SCI), Medline and Psychological Abstracts (PsycInfo) databases were searched for studies published since 1981. Reference lists from previous reviews were also searched for additional references. Studies that were not in the public domain were not searched for.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were identified by the search strategy, met the inclusion criteria and contributed to the review.
CONCLUSIONS: Associations between preoperative measures of anxiety and postoperative mood and pain have been consistently reported. Associations with regard to other recovery variables are less consistent. The existing evidence does not rule out an interpretation of the results as reflecting consistent self-reporting bias rather than causal association.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2001
Keywords: mood disorder, human, cognition, personality, coping, cognitive style, depression, anxiety, cure, recovery, prediction, pain, stress, trauma, surgery, review
Organisations: Clinical Neurosciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 18376
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18376
ISSN: 0022-3999
PURE UUID: 6755576c-91ae-43f5-89eb-4ca61f202538

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jan 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Marcus R. Munafò
Author: Jim Stevenson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×