The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Trait anxiety, defensiveness and selective processing of threat: an investigation using two measures of attentional bias

Trait anxiety, defensiveness and selective processing of threat: an investigation using two measures of attentional bias
Trait anxiety, defensiveness and selective processing of threat: an investigation using two measures of attentional bias
Attentional biases for threat were examined in a non-clinical sample (N=60), with each participant tested on both the modified Stroop colour-naming and dot probe tasks. Three groups were selected on the basis of trait anxiety and social desirability scale (SDS) scores: "low anxiety" (LA: low trait, low SDS), "repressor" (REP: low trait, high SDS) and "high anxiety" (HA: high trait, low SDS). Results from the colour-naming task suggested that high levels of defensiveness (in combination with low trait anxiety) were associated with greater avoidance of threat. The REP group showed less interference in colour-naming threat than neutral words; whereas the HA group showed increased interference due to threat words. On the dot probe task, there was a general tendency for this non-clinical sample as a whole to show avoidance of social threat relative to neutral words, but there was no bias for physical threat words. Avoidance of social threat was significant only within the REP group. No relationships were found between the measures of cognitive bias from the two tasks, suggesting different underlying mechanisms. Results are discussed in relation to previous findings and theoretical views of the effects of anxiety and defensiveness on the processing of threat.
anxiety, defensiveness, attentional bias
0191-8869
1063-1077
Mogg, Karin
5f1474af-85f5-4fd3-8eb6-0371be848e30
Bradley, Brendan P.
bdacaa6c-528b-4086-9448-27ebfe463514
Dixon, Claire
64c15a8b-f5f9-4e34-95c1-5796db594152
Fisher, Susan
ac23c39b-b8b7-48f5-baed-294128205101
Twelftree, Helen
25ef9b35-72f3-4b1e-83bc-e9327be6a75f
McWilliams, Andrew
aa9798eb-7ea4-434b-aa8c-6d93ee8b4368
Mogg, Karin
5f1474af-85f5-4fd3-8eb6-0371be848e30
Bradley, Brendan P.
bdacaa6c-528b-4086-9448-27ebfe463514
Dixon, Claire
64c15a8b-f5f9-4e34-95c1-5796db594152
Fisher, Susan
ac23c39b-b8b7-48f5-baed-294128205101
Twelftree, Helen
25ef9b35-72f3-4b1e-83bc-e9327be6a75f
McWilliams, Andrew
aa9798eb-7ea4-434b-aa8c-6d93ee8b4368

Mogg, Karin, Bradley, Brendan P., Dixon, Claire, Fisher, Susan, Twelftree, Helen and McWilliams, Andrew (2000) Trait anxiety, defensiveness and selective processing of threat: an investigation using two measures of attentional bias. Personality and Individual Differences, 28 (6), 1063-1077. (doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00157-9).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Attentional biases for threat were examined in a non-clinical sample (N=60), with each participant tested on both the modified Stroop colour-naming and dot probe tasks. Three groups were selected on the basis of trait anxiety and social desirability scale (SDS) scores: "low anxiety" (LA: low trait, low SDS), "repressor" (REP: low trait, high SDS) and "high anxiety" (HA: high trait, low SDS). Results from the colour-naming task suggested that high levels of defensiveness (in combination with low trait anxiety) were associated with greater avoidance of threat. The REP group showed less interference in colour-naming threat than neutral words; whereas the HA group showed increased interference due to threat words. On the dot probe task, there was a general tendency for this non-clinical sample as a whole to show avoidance of social threat relative to neutral words, but there was no bias for physical threat words. Avoidance of social threat was significant only within the REP group. No relationships were found between the measures of cognitive bias from the two tasks, suggesting different underlying mechanisms. Results are discussed in relation to previous findings and theoretical views of the effects of anxiety and defensiveness on the processing of threat.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2000
Keywords: anxiety, defensiveness, attentional bias

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 18417
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18417
ISSN: 0191-8869
PURE UUID: d5cce6da-1d37-460b-9771-16cbeb7005a7
ORCID for Brendan P. Bradley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2801-4271

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Dec 2005
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Karin Mogg
Author: Claire Dixon
Author: Susan Fisher
Author: Helen Twelftree
Author: Andrew McWilliams

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×