Doing and allowing, threats and sequences

Woollard, Fiona (2008) Doing and allowing, threats and sequences Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 89, (2), pp. 261-277. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.2008.00320.x).


[img] PDF Doing_Allowing_Threats_and_Sequences.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (226kB)


The distinction between doing and allowing appears to have
moral significance, but the very nature of the distinction is as yet unclear. Philippa Foot’s ‘pre-existing threats’ account of the doing/allowing distinction is highly influential. According to the best version of Foot’s account an agent brings about an outcome if and only if his behaviour is part of the sequence leading to that outcome. When understood in this way, Foot’s account escapes objections by Warren Quinn and Jonathan Bennett. However, more analysis is required to show what makes a relevant condition part of a sequence. Foot’s account is promising, but incomplete.

Item Type: Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.2008.00320.x
ISSNs: 0279-0750 (print)
ePrint ID: 184461
Date :
Date Event
25 May 2008e-pub ahead of print
June 2008Published
Date Deposited: 06 May 2011 08:30
Last Modified: 18 Apr 2017 02:20
Further Information:Google Scholar

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item