The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Most ways I could move: comparing subsets of the behaviour space in Bennett’s act/omission distinction

Woollard, Fiona (2011) Most ways I could move: comparing subsets of the behaviour space in Bennett’s act/omission distinction Mind, 120, (477), pp. 155-182. (doi:10.1093/mind/fzr012).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The distinction between action and omission is of interest in both theoretical and practical philosophy. We use this distinction daily in our descriptions of behaviour and appeal to it in moral judgements. However, the very nature of the act/omission distinction is as yet unclear. Jonathan Bennett’s account of the distinction in terms of positive and negative facts is one of the most promising attempts to give an analysis of the ontological distinction between action and omission. According to Bennett’s account, an upshot is the result of an agent’s action if and only if the relevant fact about her conduct is positive. A proposition about an agent’s conduct is positive if and only if most possible movements of the agent would not have made that proposition true. However, Bennett’s account will fail unless it is possible to make sense of claims about ‘most possible movements of the agent’. We need a way of comparing the size of subsets of the behaviour space (the set of possible movements). I argue that Bennett’s own method of comparison is unsatisfactory. I present an alternative method of comparing subsets of the behaviour space.

PDF The_Behaviour_Space.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (264kB)

More information

Published date: January 2011
Organisations: Philosophy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 184563
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/184563
ISSN: 0026-4423
PURE UUID: 44f0629f-2014-49d6-8e89-7a1ae5a0b8e4

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 May 2011 08:27
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 11:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×