The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Smoking expectancy mediates the conditioned responses to arbitrary smoking cues

Smoking expectancy mediates the conditioned responses to arbitrary smoking cues
Smoking expectancy mediates the conditioned responses to arbitrary smoking cues
Smokers' responses to smoking cues may be the result of a classical conditioning process. There is evidence that classical conditioning may not proceed in human subjects unless subjects are consciously aware of the stimulus (CS)-reinforcer (UCS) contingencies. In two experiments the role of CS[left right arrow]UCS contingency awareness in the expression of conditioned responses (craving, salivation, and skin conductance) was studied. A discriminative classical conditioning paradigm was used during which subjects were presented with one stimulus (the CS+) always paired with cigarette smoking (the UCS) and another (the CS-) never paired with cigarette smoking. Half of the subjects were given instructions to discover the CS[left right arrow]UCS contingencies (group 'aware', AWR), whereas the other half were not (group 'unaware', UWR). In experiment 1, all subjects responded to the CS+ with increased cigarette craving relative to the CS-; this effect was more pronounced in the AWR group compared to the UWR group. A lower amount of salivation in response to the CS+ compared to the CS- was found in the UWR group. These between-group differences were interpreted as a consequence of the enhanced expectancies of smoking in the presence of CS+ in group AWR compared to group UWR. In experiment 2, the observed craving responses to CS+ and CS- were consistent with those seen in experiment 1, but no discriminative salivary response to the stimuli was found. When, after conditioning training, subjects' expectancies of smoking were removed by instructions, and their responses to CS+ and CS- were again measured, the discriminative craving response to CS+ and CS- was eliminated and all subjects demonstrated a lower amount of salivation in response to the CS+ compared to the CS-. These data suggest that presentation of arbitrary cues previously paired with cigarette smoking can elicit CRs and that facilitation of awareness of the CS[left right arrow]UCS contingency by instructions can potentiate craving CRs. In addition, these data suggest that craving CRs can be eliminated, whereas compensatory CRs can be facilitated, when cigarette expectancy is removed with instructions.
0955-8810
183-194
Field, M.
8ecc8fff-737b-48f0-b333-98e230f1206e
Duka, T.
eda92f29-9587-494a-b5e4-efbc7fd5a5b5
Field, M.
8ecc8fff-737b-48f0-b333-98e230f1206e
Duka, T.
eda92f29-9587-494a-b5e4-efbc7fd5a5b5

Field, M. and Duka, T. (2001) Smoking expectancy mediates the conditioned responses to arbitrary smoking cues. Behavioural Pharmacology, 12 (3), 183-194.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Smokers' responses to smoking cues may be the result of a classical conditioning process. There is evidence that classical conditioning may not proceed in human subjects unless subjects are consciously aware of the stimulus (CS)-reinforcer (UCS) contingencies. In two experiments the role of CS[left right arrow]UCS contingency awareness in the expression of conditioned responses (craving, salivation, and skin conductance) was studied. A discriminative classical conditioning paradigm was used during which subjects were presented with one stimulus (the CS+) always paired with cigarette smoking (the UCS) and another (the CS-) never paired with cigarette smoking. Half of the subjects were given instructions to discover the CS[left right arrow]UCS contingencies (group 'aware', AWR), whereas the other half were not (group 'unaware', UWR). In experiment 1, all subjects responded to the CS+ with increased cigarette craving relative to the CS-; this effect was more pronounced in the AWR group compared to the UWR group. A lower amount of salivation in response to the CS+ compared to the CS- was found in the UWR group. These between-group differences were interpreted as a consequence of the enhanced expectancies of smoking in the presence of CS+ in group AWR compared to group UWR. In experiment 2, the observed craving responses to CS+ and CS- were consistent with those seen in experiment 1, but no discriminative salivary response to the stimuli was found. When, after conditioning training, subjects' expectancies of smoking were removed by instructions, and their responses to CS+ and CS- were again measured, the discriminative craving response to CS+ and CS- was eliminated and all subjects demonstrated a lower amount of salivation in response to the CS+ compared to the CS-. These data suggest that presentation of arbitrary cues previously paired with cigarette smoking can elicit CRs and that facilitation of awareness of the CS[left right arrow]UCS contingency by instructions can potentiate craving CRs. In addition, these data suggest that craving CRs can be eliminated, whereas compensatory CRs can be facilitated, when cigarette expectancy is removed with instructions.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2001

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 18476
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18476
ISSN: 0955-8810
PURE UUID: 4c5fbe26-6524-4166-a0d5-4fe5c5375365

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Dec 2005
Last modified: 07 Jan 2022 22:01

Export record

Contributors

Author: M. Field
Author: T. Duka

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×