The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Design of steel framed buildings at risk from terrorist attack

Design of steel framed buildings at risk from terrorist attack
Design of steel framed buildings at risk from terrorist attack
Robust frames require relatively weak beams, but strong connections and columns. Limit state design may provide the reverse. The composite beams used in the majority of steel framed buildings are shown to possess a “hidden” reserve of strength. When subjected to the large sagging deformations associated with terrorist attacks, these beams are capable of resisting typically twice their design load. This creates a situation whereby the weak point in a frame can be transferred to the connections, leading to non-ductile and potentially catastrophic failures in the event of severe overloading. Furthermore, certain industry standard nominally pinned connections are shown to lack the ductility required to accommodate large beam end rotations. This lack of ductility could result in the premature failure of connections due to the high tensile forces generated in the connection bolts. To address these problems an alternative approach is advocated, whereby ductile beams are designed to resist only working loads, albeit elastically. Thereafter the upper-bound flexural strength is established. It is the corresponding upper-bound reactions that are used for the subsequent design of components lower down in the load path. This approach would improve robustness and provide economies in the use of construction materials in structures considered at risk from terrorist attack.
1466-5123
31-38
Byfield, M.P.
35515781-c39d-4fe0-86c8-608c87287964
Byfield, M.P.
35515781-c39d-4fe0-86c8-608c87287964

Byfield, M.P. (2004) Design of steel framed buildings at risk from terrorist attack. The Structural Engineer, 82 (22), 31-38.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Robust frames require relatively weak beams, but strong connections and columns. Limit state design may provide the reverse. The composite beams used in the majority of steel framed buildings are shown to possess a “hidden” reserve of strength. When subjected to the large sagging deformations associated with terrorist attacks, these beams are capable of resisting typically twice their design load. This creates a situation whereby the weak point in a frame can be transferred to the connections, leading to non-ductile and potentially catastrophic failures in the event of severe overloading. Furthermore, certain industry standard nominally pinned connections are shown to lack the ductility required to accommodate large beam end rotations. This lack of ductility could result in the premature failure of connections due to the high tensile forces generated in the connection bolts. To address these problems an alternative approach is advocated, whereby ductile beams are designed to resist only working loads, albeit elastically. Thereafter the upper-bound flexural strength is established. It is the corresponding upper-bound reactions that are used for the subsequent design of components lower down in the load path. This approach would improve robustness and provide economies in the use of construction materials in structures considered at risk from terrorist attack.

Text
46288.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: November 2004

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 185277
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/185277
ISSN: 1466-5123
PURE UUID: 4bcf3a2e-50f4-4228-a9f0-4f52f74d35a3
ORCID for M.P. Byfield: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9724-9472

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 May 2011 13:41
Last modified: 18 May 2019 00:35

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×