Comparing debt characteristics and LGD models for different collections policies


Thomas, L.C., Matuszyk, A. and Moore, A. (2012) Comparing debt characteristics and LGD models for different collections policies International Journal of Forecasting, 28, (1), pp. 196-203. (doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.11.004).

Download

[img] Microsoft Word ijfrevisionsent0810.doc - Accepted Manuscript
Download (536kB)

Description/Abstract

This paper discusses the similarities and differences in the collection process between in-house and 3rd party collection. The objective is to show that, although the same type of modelling approach to estimating the Loss Given Default (LGD) can be used in both cases, the details will be significantly different. In particular, the form of the LGD distribution suggests that one needs to split the distribution in different ways in the two cases, as well as using different variables. The comparisons are made using two data sets of the collection outcomes from two sets of unsecured consumer defaulters

Item Type: Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.11.004
ISSNs: 0169-2070 (print)
Subjects:
Organisations: Centre of Excellence for International Banking, Finance & Accounting
ePrint ID: 185281
Date :
Date Event
January 2012Published
Date Deposited: 11 May 2011 14:23
Last Modified: 18 Apr 2017 02:17
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/185281

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item