When more means less: factors affecting human self-control in a local versus global choice paradigm
When more means less: factors affecting human self-control in a local versus global choice paradigm
Adult human participants experienced 200 trials in which they repeatedly chose between two immediately available rewards of different magnitudes (points exchangeable for money). Although choosing the larger reward always resulted in more points per trial, choosing the smaller reward increased the magnitude of both rewards on the next trial.
Thus consistent choice of the smaller reward resulted in a greater average number of points overall. This effect on global (overall) reinforcement rate was gradual and difficult to perceive by comparison with the (opposed) difference in points between the two alternatives on a given trial (local rate). Participants generally preferred the larger reward and thus failed to maximize the global reinforcement rate.
Preference for this higher local rate of reinforcement increased when the difference in local rates was larger. However, when the salience of the global contingency was enhanced by providing cognitive or social comparative information, participants chose the larger reward less often and thus increased global reinforcement rate.
53-73
Warry, Chris J.
04a1e6cb-6258-46f7-a146-cac523ae1448
Remington, Bob
87f75b79-4207-4b3a-8ad0-a8e4b26c010f
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J. S.
bc80bf95-6cf9-4c76-a09d-eaaf0b717635
1999
Warry, Chris J.
04a1e6cb-6258-46f7-a146-cac523ae1448
Remington, Bob
87f75b79-4207-4b3a-8ad0-a8e4b26c010f
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J. S.
bc80bf95-6cf9-4c76-a09d-eaaf0b717635
Warry, Chris J., Remington, Bob and Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J. S.
(1999)
When more means less: factors affecting human self-control in a local versus global choice paradigm.
Learning and Motivation, 30 (1), .
(doi:10.1006/lmot.1998.1018).
Abstract
Adult human participants experienced 200 trials in which they repeatedly chose between two immediately available rewards of different magnitudes (points exchangeable for money). Although choosing the larger reward always resulted in more points per trial, choosing the smaller reward increased the magnitude of both rewards on the next trial.
Thus consistent choice of the smaller reward resulted in a greater average number of points overall. This effect on global (overall) reinforcement rate was gradual and difficult to perceive by comparison with the (opposed) difference in points between the two alternatives on a given trial (local rate). Participants generally preferred the larger reward and thus failed to maximize the global reinforcement rate.
Preference for this higher local rate of reinforcement increased when the difference in local rates was larger. However, when the salience of the global contingency was enhanced by providing cognitive or social comparative information, participants chose the larger reward less often and thus increased global reinforcement rate.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1999
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 18535
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18535
ISSN: 0023-9690
PURE UUID: d59e6fc0-6144-41ba-9a86-63f2eb8510be
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Dec 2005
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:05
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Chris J. Warry
Author:
Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics