The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Threats to validity in the longitudinal study of psychological effects: the case of short stature

Threats to validity in the longitudinal study of psychological effects: the case of short stature
Threats to validity in the longitudinal study of psychological effects: the case of short stature
In all studies of health-related problems and their effects on well-being, research design issues threaten to compromise the validity of findings. This is particularly so in a longitudinal study, essentially stemming from the tension between maintaining participant compliance and retaining investigator objectivity. Such a tension may be exacerbated where measures of dependent variables such as self-esteem are used alongside the collection of physical data which is essential to the study, as in research into the psychological effects of short stature on children and young people.
In this paper one particular project, the Wessex Growth Study, is used to illustrate the common threats to validity, both internal and external, of such research, and to consider future improvements in design. The Wessex Growth Study, set up in 1986, was designed to overcome some of the methodological problems found in earlier research with short stature children. It is following the growth and psychological development through their school years of a cohort of short children (below third centile for height when first identified) and case-matched controls (10th?90th centiles) recruited at school entry (ages 5/6). Findings have generally found only small differences between short and average height children.
Though these results so far have mainly been presented cross-sectionally, the young people involved are followed up at 6-monthly intervals for height and other data to be collected, and thus to some extent the study also has the advantages and problems of a longitudinal research design.
Using Campbell and Stanley's criteria this article makes clear the strain on both internal and external validity in the study, but argues that these problems are to some extent inherent in all longitudinal psychological research, and are outweighed in the present research by the collection of data on short stature which would not otherwise be available. Future data collection within the study will introduce further improvements in design.
401-419
Stratford, R.
700033ac-1d02-4d20-babb-6df278be214d
Mulligan, J.
dfcb8ed3-df23-4808-a137-6e3f7503063f
Downie, B.
fdd746db-2992-43ac-8c93-66a438b6aa9b
Voss, L.
ba2b50cc-00d1-4ea2-87f7-1890f3eeb386
Stratford, R.
700033ac-1d02-4d20-babb-6df278be214d
Mulligan, J.
dfcb8ed3-df23-4808-a137-6e3f7503063f
Downie, B.
fdd746db-2992-43ac-8c93-66a438b6aa9b
Voss, L.
ba2b50cc-00d1-4ea2-87f7-1890f3eeb386

Stratford, R., Mulligan, J., Downie, B. and Voss, L. (1999) Threats to validity in the longitudinal study of psychological effects: the case of short stature. Child Care, Health and Development, 25 (6), 401-419. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2214.1999.00110.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In all studies of health-related problems and their effects on well-being, research design issues threaten to compromise the validity of findings. This is particularly so in a longitudinal study, essentially stemming from the tension between maintaining participant compliance and retaining investigator objectivity. Such a tension may be exacerbated where measures of dependent variables such as self-esteem are used alongside the collection of physical data which is essential to the study, as in research into the psychological effects of short stature on children and young people.
In this paper one particular project, the Wessex Growth Study, is used to illustrate the common threats to validity, both internal and external, of such research, and to consider future improvements in design. The Wessex Growth Study, set up in 1986, was designed to overcome some of the methodological problems found in earlier research with short stature children. It is following the growth and psychological development through their school years of a cohort of short children (below third centile for height when first identified) and case-matched controls (10th?90th centiles) recruited at school entry (ages 5/6). Findings have generally found only small differences between short and average height children.
Though these results so far have mainly been presented cross-sectionally, the young people involved are followed up at 6-monthly intervals for height and other data to be collected, and thus to some extent the study also has the advantages and problems of a longitudinal research design.
Using Campbell and Stanley's criteria this article makes clear the strain on both internal and external validity in the study, but argues that these problems are to some extent inherent in all longitudinal psychological research, and are outweighed in the present research by the collection of data on short stature which would not otherwise be available. Future data collection within the study will introduce further improvements in design.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1999
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 18553
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18553
PURE UUID: 3da49fff-e2a0-4d3b-aa06-f4ffe0a2c454

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Dec 2005
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: R. Stratford
Author: J. Mulligan
Author: B. Downie
Author: L. Voss

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×