The application of a paired-comparisons technique to identify sequences of recovery after severe head injury
The application of a paired-comparisons technique to identify sequences of recovery after severe head injury
The "paired preference technique" PPT as a method for establishing the most likely sequences of recovery in a group of people surviving severe head injury is described. In the PPT every item of observed behaviour is compared with every other item of behaviour in a series of paired comparisons. This is similar to the technique described by Allen and Yen 1979 which they called the "paired comparison method". We believe this method is suitable for data which are not amenable to more conventional methods of analysis because of different numbers of observations across subjects or because of missing data. We describe the PPT, provide examples from an observational study of 88 head-injured patients, and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of this method of analysis.
441-458
Watson, Martin J.
a065fb21-f6b9-4c78-8f14-e7d5e0f60c8d
Horn, Sandra
8637e72e-5576-42ea-bbe5-f67f01e336d1
1997
Watson, Martin J.
a065fb21-f6b9-4c78-8f14-e7d5e0f60c8d
Horn, Sandra
8637e72e-5576-42ea-bbe5-f67f01e336d1
Watson, Martin J. and Horn, Sandra
(1997)
The application of a paired-comparisons technique to identify sequences of recovery after severe head injury.
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 7 (4), .
Abstract
The "paired preference technique" PPT as a method for establishing the most likely sequences of recovery in a group of people surviving severe head injury is described. In the PPT every item of observed behaviour is compared with every other item of behaviour in a series of paired comparisons. This is similar to the technique described by Allen and Yen 1979 which they called the "paired comparison method". We believe this method is suitable for data which are not amenable to more conventional methods of analysis because of different numbers of observations across subjects or because of missing data. We describe the PPT, provide examples from an observational study of 88 head-injured patients, and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of this method of analysis.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1997
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 18568
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18568
PURE UUID: ad0d260a-b991-48c5-a469-f928017dfd69
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 02 Dec 2005
Last modified: 07 Jan 2022 22:01
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Martin J. Watson
Author:
Sandra Horn
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics