The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Identifying nurse staffing research in Medline: development and testing of empirically derived search strategies with the PubMed interface

Identifying nurse staffing research in Medline: development and testing of empirically derived search strategies with the PubMed interface
Identifying nurse staffing research in Medline: development and testing of empirically derived search strategies with the PubMed interface
Background: The identification of health services research in databases such as PubMed/Medline is a cumbersome task. This task becomes even more difficult if the field of interest involves the use of diverse methods and data sources, as is the case with nurse staffing research. This type of research investigates the association between nurse staffing parameters and nursing and patient outcomes. A comprehensively developed search strategy may help identify nurse staffing research in PubMed/Medline.

Methods: A set of relevant references in PubMed/Medline was identified by means of three systematic reviews. This development set was used to detect candidate free-text and MeSH terms. The frequency of these terms was compared to a random sample from PubMed/Medline in order to identify terms specific to nurse staffing research, which were then used to develop a sensitive, precise and balanced search strategy. To determine their precision, the newly developed search strategies were tested against a) the pool of relevant references extracted from the systematic reviews, b) a reference set identified from an electronic journal screening, and c) a sample from PubMed/Medline. Finally, all newly developed strategies were compared to PubMed's Health Services Research Queries (PubMed's HSR Queries).

Results: The sensitivities of the newly developed search strategies were almost 100% in all of the three test sets applied; precision ranged from 6.1% to 32.0%. PubMed's HSR queries were less sensitive (83.3% to 88.2%) than the new search strategies. Only minor differences in precision were found (5.0% to 32.0%).

Conclusions: As with other literature on health services research, nurse staffing studies are difficult to identify in PubMed/Medline. Depending on the purpose of the search, researchers can choose between high sensitivity and retrieval of a large number of references or high precision, i.e. and an increased risk of missing relevant references, respectively. More standardized terminology (e.g. by consistent use of the term "nurse staffing") could improve the precision of future searches in this field. Empirically selected search terms can help to develop effective search strategies. The high consistency between all test sets confirmed the validity of our approach.

1471-2288
76-84
Simon, Michael
6e9ad30e-c22f-455a-945e-98d77dcec479
Hausner, Elke
46f0521e-b083-48e4-a5c6-4cc6c24fa4d6
Klaus, Susan F.
75a1656d-b414-45fd-8976-deb72ad5e02f
Dunton, Nancy E.
e31c9833-362e-43d1-b17d-932cbb5a7d25
Simon, Michael
6e9ad30e-c22f-455a-945e-98d77dcec479
Hausner, Elke
46f0521e-b083-48e4-a5c6-4cc6c24fa4d6
Klaus, Susan F.
75a1656d-b414-45fd-8976-deb72ad5e02f
Dunton, Nancy E.
e31c9833-362e-43d1-b17d-932cbb5a7d25

Simon, Michael, Hausner, Elke, Klaus, Susan F. and Dunton, Nancy E. (2010) Identifying nurse staffing research in Medline: development and testing of empirically derived search strategies with the PubMed interface. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10 (1), 76-84. (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-76). (PMID:20731858)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: The identification of health services research in databases such as PubMed/Medline is a cumbersome task. This task becomes even more difficult if the field of interest involves the use of diverse methods and data sources, as is the case with nurse staffing research. This type of research investigates the association between nurse staffing parameters and nursing and patient outcomes. A comprehensively developed search strategy may help identify nurse staffing research in PubMed/Medline.

Methods: A set of relevant references in PubMed/Medline was identified by means of three systematic reviews. This development set was used to detect candidate free-text and MeSH terms. The frequency of these terms was compared to a random sample from PubMed/Medline in order to identify terms specific to nurse staffing research, which were then used to develop a sensitive, precise and balanced search strategy. To determine their precision, the newly developed search strategies were tested against a) the pool of relevant references extracted from the systematic reviews, b) a reference set identified from an electronic journal screening, and c) a sample from PubMed/Medline. Finally, all newly developed strategies were compared to PubMed's Health Services Research Queries (PubMed's HSR Queries).

Results: The sensitivities of the newly developed search strategies were almost 100% in all of the three test sets applied; precision ranged from 6.1% to 32.0%. PubMed's HSR queries were less sensitive (83.3% to 88.2%) than the new search strategies. Only minor differences in precision were found (5.0% to 32.0%).

Conclusions: As with other literature on health services research, nurse staffing studies are difficult to identify in PubMed/Medline. Depending on the purpose of the search, researchers can choose between high sensitivity and retrieval of a large number of references or high precision, i.e. and an increased risk of missing relevant references, respectively. More standardized terminology (e.g. by consistent use of the term "nurse staffing") could improve the precision of future searches in this field. Empirically selected search terms can help to develop effective search strategies. The high consistency between all test sets confirmed the validity of our approach.

Text
Identifying_nurse_staffing_research_in_Medline.pdf - Version of Record
Download (747kB)

More information

Published date: 23 August 2010

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 186177
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/186177
ISSN: 1471-2288
PURE UUID: 3b955d10-4161-45a7-a5a4-2cc5a16285ee

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 May 2011 13:21
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 03:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Michael Simon
Author: Elke Hausner
Author: Susan F. Klaus
Author: Nancy E. Dunton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×