The commission on the limits of the continental shelf and its disturbing propensity to legislate
The commission on the limits of the continental shelf and its disturbing propensity to legislate
Created by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea to apply the rules in Article 76 on the outer limits of the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles from States’ territorial sea baselines, the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf has on several occasions introduced new requirements for States not supported by Article 76, or impermissibly qualifying the rights Article 76 accords them. This article focuses on several such instances, one to the coastal State’s advantage (though temporally rather than spatially), another neutral (though requiring unnecessary work of States), but the remainder all tending to reduce the area of continental shelves. The net effect has been to deprive States of areas of legal continental shelf to which a reasonable interpretation of Article 76 entitles them, and in one case even of their right to have their submissions examined on their merits, even though, paradoxically, the well-meaning intention behind at least some of the Commission’s pronouncements was to avoid other controversies
355-383
Serdy, Andrew
0b9326c4-8a5a-468f-9ca8-7368ccb07663
2011
Serdy, Andrew
0b9326c4-8a5a-468f-9ca8-7368ccb07663
Serdy, Andrew
(2011)
The commission on the limits of the continental shelf and its disturbing propensity to legislate.
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 26 (3), .
(doi:10.1163/157180811X582175).
Abstract
Created by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea to apply the rules in Article 76 on the outer limits of the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles from States’ territorial sea baselines, the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf has on several occasions introduced new requirements for States not supported by Article 76, or impermissibly qualifying the rights Article 76 accords them. This article focuses on several such instances, one to the coastal State’s advantage (though temporally rather than spatially), another neutral (though requiring unnecessary work of States), but the remainder all tending to reduce the area of continental shelves. The net effect has been to deprive States of areas of legal continental shelf to which a reasonable interpretation of Article 76 entitles them, and in one case even of their right to have their submissions examined on their merits, even though, paradoxically, the well-meaning intention behind at least some of the Commission’s pronouncements was to avoid other controversies
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2011
Organisations:
Faculty of Business, Law and Art, Law
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 186303
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/186303
PURE UUID: 7ddae23b-4384-4f96-b04b-8b27bb1f2cc6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 May 2011 08:45
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:23
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
