The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Predicting design-induced error in the cockpit

Stanton, Neville A., Harris, Don, Salmon, Paul M., Demagalski, Jason, Marshall, Andrew, Waldmann, Thomas, Dekker, Sidney and Young, Mark S. (2010) Predicting design-induced error in the cockpit Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation, 42, (1), pp. 1-10.

Record type: Article


This paper describes the Human Error Identification (HEI) Technique called the Human Error Template (HET). HET has been developed specifically for the aerospace industry in response to Certification Specification (CS) 25.1302. In particular, it is intended as an aid for the early identification of design-induced errors, and as a formal method to demonstrate the inclusion of human factors issues in the design and certification process of aircraft flight decks, including supplemental type certification. The template-based approach was chosen because it appeared to be quick to learn and easy to use. HET uses a hierarchical task analysis as its starting point. A checklist of twelve (12) external error modes is used to determine which might lead to credible errors for each task step. For each credible error a description is given and the outcome described. If the likelihood of the error and the consequences are both high then that task step is rated as a ‘Fail’. The error mode taxonomy developed comprises: fail to execute a task, task execution incomplete, in the wrong direction, wrong task executed, task repeated, on the wrong interface element, too early, too late, too much, too little, misread information, and other. HET was then compared to SHERPA, HAZOP and HEIST. Thirty seven (37) analysts were employed in this study based on a landing scenario. HET showed significantly better Sensitivity Index scores than any of the other methods, and the greatest number of correct error predictions (hits). The results from the HET validation study demonstrate that HET meets all the criteria set. It is easy to learn, the error taxonomy has been specifically designed for flight-deck tasks, it is auditable, and it has been proved to be both reliable and valid. HET is recommended for use in the design, evaluation and certification of aircraft flight-decks.

PDF predictingdesigninducederror.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (124kB)

More information

Published date: 2010
Organisations: Civil Maritime & Env. Eng & Sci Unit


Local EPrints ID: 186471
ISSN: 1990-7710
PURE UUID: 4d93f0fa-9cac-4801-9819-d41afa8e5e3e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 May 2011 12:39
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 11:47

Export record


Author: Don Harris
Author: Paul M. Salmon
Author: Jason Demagalski
Author: Andrew Marshall
Author: Thomas Waldmann
Author: Sidney Dekker
Author: Mark S. Young

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.