Is the Behavioural Inhibition System the core vulnerability for Cluster C personality disorders?
Is the Behavioural Inhibition System the core vulnerability for Cluster C personality disorders?
The aim of the present study was to determine if Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS) functioning, as described by Gray (Gray, J.A.C. (1982). The Neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the Septo-Hippocampal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press), would be a core vulnerability for cluster C personality disorders (PD), that is, if these patients would show a higher anxiety trait (i.e. in Gray's terms) than patients with other PD or without Axis II disorders. A total sample of 77 out-patients was assessed with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Scales, Karolinska Scales of Personality, and the Structured-Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II). Analyses were conducted considering the following groups: presence of cluster C personality disorder/s, presence of clusters A/B personality disorder/s, absence of personality disorder (non-PD). As a second step, cluster C and non-PD groups were also subdivided according to the presence/absence of anxiety or affective Axis I symptoms. Overall, results showed higher scores on anxiety trait-related scales in the cluster C group. However, only Somatic Anxiety, Psychasthenia and Sensitivity to Punishment scales (SP) clearly distinguished cluster C from each one of the other two groups. After a second analysis, only the Sensitivity to Punishment scale showed independence from Axis I status while discriminating between cluster C and non-PD patients. Results were similar when only behavioural items from the SP scale were considered. From these results we can conclude that a higher BIS functioning would differentiate cluster C personality disorders from patients with other PD or without PD, and that considering only the behavioural anxiety component in their assessment, a low Axis I influence is obtained.
anxiety, personality disorders, cluster c, behavioural inhibition system
349-359
Caseras, X.
0d600775-cb80-4b06-a6e9-03b231ff6a9a
Torrubia, R.
05c0ed5c-4744-4079-89b6-f38f5e6eb5d5
Farr, J.M.
2a1d201d-23b6-4f00-b11f-28e906ee9f43
2001
Caseras, X.
0d600775-cb80-4b06-a6e9-03b231ff6a9a
Torrubia, R.
05c0ed5c-4744-4079-89b6-f38f5e6eb5d5
Farr, J.M.
2a1d201d-23b6-4f00-b11f-28e906ee9f43
Caseras, X., Torrubia, R. and Farr, J.M.
(2001)
Is the Behavioural Inhibition System the core vulnerability for Cluster C personality disorders?
Personality and Individual Differences, 31 (3), .
(doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00141-0).
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to determine if Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS) functioning, as described by Gray (Gray, J.A.C. (1982). The Neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the Septo-Hippocampal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press), would be a core vulnerability for cluster C personality disorders (PD), that is, if these patients would show a higher anxiety trait (i.e. in Gray's terms) than patients with other PD or without Axis II disorders. A total sample of 77 out-patients was assessed with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Scales, Karolinska Scales of Personality, and the Structured-Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II). Analyses were conducted considering the following groups: presence of cluster C personality disorder/s, presence of clusters A/B personality disorder/s, absence of personality disorder (non-PD). As a second step, cluster C and non-PD groups were also subdivided according to the presence/absence of anxiety or affective Axis I symptoms. Overall, results showed higher scores on anxiety trait-related scales in the cluster C group. However, only Somatic Anxiety, Psychasthenia and Sensitivity to Punishment scales (SP) clearly distinguished cluster C from each one of the other two groups. After a second analysis, only the Sensitivity to Punishment scale showed independence from Axis I status while discriminating between cluster C and non-PD patients. Results were similar when only behavioural items from the SP scale were considered. From these results we can conclude that a higher BIS functioning would differentiate cluster C personality disorders from patients with other PD or without PD, and that considering only the behavioural anxiety component in their assessment, a low Axis I influence is obtained.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2001
Keywords:
anxiety, personality disorders, cluster c, behavioural inhibition system
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 18654
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18654
ISSN: 0191-8869
PURE UUID: 9d429ebf-03a2-41c0-9902-cd18c699e601
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Nov 2005
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:06
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
X. Caseras
Author:
R. Torrubia
Author:
J.M. Farr
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics