Reduced modulus action in u-section steel sheet pile retaining walls
Reduced modulus action in u-section steel sheet pile retaining walls
U-section steel sheet piles are used for constructing retaining walls and they are connected together to form continuous walls using sliding joints located along their centerlines. Interpile movement along these joints can, in theory, reduce strength by 55% and stiffness by 70%, in comparison with the performance of piles in which no slip occurs (full composite action). This problem of interlock slippage is known as reduced modulus action (RMA). Despite the potential for this problem, it is common practice in many countries to ignore RMA in design, although the exact conditions governing when it becomes a design issue are not fully understood. This paper presents results from an investigation into this problem using experimental tests carried out using miniature piles. Unlike previous studies these tests were carried out using a similar load arrangement to that found in practice. The investigation indicates that the loading configuration affects the development of RMA and that friction between pile interlocks has the potential to mitigate much of the effect of RMA. A numerical model simulating the tests was developed and it has been used to model full-scale piles. The study indicates that many commonly occurring forms of steel sheet pile walls are unlikely to exhibit significant problems from RMA and this is relevant to pile design using Eurocode 3: Part 5
steel piling, retaining walls, design, soil structure interaction, codes, eurocodes, reduced modulus action, u-piles, sheet piling, larssen piles, composite action
439-445
Mawer, R.
b5f85b82-9c10-4091-9870-79f9eb4a920f
Byfield, M.P.
35515781-c39d-4fe0-86c8-608c87287964
March 2010
Mawer, R.
b5f85b82-9c10-4091-9870-79f9eb4a920f
Byfield, M.P.
35515781-c39d-4fe0-86c8-608c87287964
Mawer, R. and Byfield, M.P.
(2010)
Reduced modulus action in u-section steel sheet pile retaining walls.
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136 (3), .
(doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000231).
Abstract
U-section steel sheet piles are used for constructing retaining walls and they are connected together to form continuous walls using sliding joints located along their centerlines. Interpile movement along these joints can, in theory, reduce strength by 55% and stiffness by 70%, in comparison with the performance of piles in which no slip occurs (full composite action). This problem of interlock slippage is known as reduced modulus action (RMA). Despite the potential for this problem, it is common practice in many countries to ignore RMA in design, although the exact conditions governing when it becomes a design issue are not fully understood. This paper presents results from an investigation into this problem using experimental tests carried out using miniature piles. Unlike previous studies these tests were carried out using a similar load arrangement to that found in practice. The investigation indicates that the loading configuration affects the development of RMA and that friction between pile interlocks has the potential to mitigate much of the effect of RMA. A numerical model simulating the tests was developed and it has been used to model full-scale piles. The study indicates that many commonly occurring forms of steel sheet pile walls are unlikely to exhibit significant problems from RMA and this is relevant to pile design using Eurocode 3: Part 5
Text
QGT000439.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: August 2009
Published date: March 2010
Keywords:
steel piling, retaining walls, design, soil structure interaction, codes, eurocodes, reduced modulus action, u-piles, sheet piling, larssen piles, composite action
Organisations:
Infrastructure Group, Civil Engineering & the Environment
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 186597
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/186597
ISSN: 1090-0241
PURE UUID: 4534c19e-142d-4061-af33-8600ce524199
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 May 2011 13:52
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 03:20
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
R. Mawer
Author:
M.P. Byfield
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics