The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Conducting oral examinations for cancer in general practice: what are the barriers?

Conducting oral examinations for cancer in general practice: what are the barriers?
Conducting oral examinations for cancer in general practice: what are the barriers?
Background: the incidence of oral (mouth) cancer in the UK is continuing to rise. Individuals who are at greatest risk rarely visit a dentist but do consult general medical practitioners (GMPs). Therefore, GMPs could have an important role in the early detection of oral cancer. Research has shown that GMPs do not opportunistically screen high-risk individuals; however, the barriers to screening are poorly understood.

Objectives: to understand the reasons why GMPs may not screen for oral cancer.

Methods: a questionnaire was developed, using the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), to measure GMPs attitudes to and screening for oral cancer. The questionnaire was designed using all the key theoretical constructs of the TPB and incorporating the themes identified in a qualitative elicitation study. The questionnaire was posted to 499 GPs in Surrey Primary Care trust.

Results: two hundred and twenty-eight completed questionnaires were returned (46%). Two TPB constructs [subjective norm (e.g. peer pressure) and perceived external control factors (e.g. adequate equipment, time constraints)] were identified as significant predictors of ‘intention’ to perform oral screening. Intention and perceived internal control factors (e.g. self-efficacy) were predictive of actually performing oral screening with patients.

Conclusions: the results of the study suggest that there is considerable potential for improving intention to perform oral cancer screening in general practice. Theory-based interventions could include further training to enhance confidence, expertise, knowledge and ease of examination, the provision of adequate equipment in the surgery and increasing the motivation to comply with significant others by introducing guidelines on opportunistic screening
0263-2136
77-84
Wade, J.
f3b79eba-d265-4f5e-a3f9-989e648bda80
Smith, H.
cc42a332-71ec-436f-8207-9151275a92d8
Hankins, M.
ce4b7d68-3320-4af4-9dd7-3537a4b07219
Llewellyn, Carrie
f618e0d0-7b27-4132-b92c-e977422d9439
Wade, J.
f3b79eba-d265-4f5e-a3f9-989e648bda80
Smith, H.
cc42a332-71ec-436f-8207-9151275a92d8
Hankins, M.
ce4b7d68-3320-4af4-9dd7-3537a4b07219
Llewellyn, Carrie
f618e0d0-7b27-4132-b92c-e977422d9439

Wade, J., Smith, H., Hankins, M. and Llewellyn, Carrie (2010) Conducting oral examinations for cancer in general practice: what are the barriers? Family Practice, 27 (1), 77-84. (doi:10.1093/fampra/cmp064).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the incidence of oral (mouth) cancer in the UK is continuing to rise. Individuals who are at greatest risk rarely visit a dentist but do consult general medical practitioners (GMPs). Therefore, GMPs could have an important role in the early detection of oral cancer. Research has shown that GMPs do not opportunistically screen high-risk individuals; however, the barriers to screening are poorly understood.

Objectives: to understand the reasons why GMPs may not screen for oral cancer.

Methods: a questionnaire was developed, using the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), to measure GMPs attitudes to and screening for oral cancer. The questionnaire was designed using all the key theoretical constructs of the TPB and incorporating the themes identified in a qualitative elicitation study. The questionnaire was posted to 499 GPs in Surrey Primary Care trust.

Results: two hundred and twenty-eight completed questionnaires were returned (46%). Two TPB constructs [subjective norm (e.g. peer pressure) and perceived external control factors (e.g. adequate equipment, time constraints)] were identified as significant predictors of ‘intention’ to perform oral screening. Intention and perceived internal control factors (e.g. self-efficacy) were predictive of actually performing oral screening with patients.

Conclusions: the results of the study suggest that there is considerable potential for improving intention to perform oral cancer screening in general practice. Theory-based interventions could include further training to enhance confidence, expertise, knowledge and ease of examination, the provision of adequate equipment in the surgery and increasing the motivation to comply with significant others by introducing guidelines on opportunistic screening

Text
Conducting_oral_examinations.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: October 2010
Organisations: Education, Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 187303
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/187303
ISSN: 0263-2136
PURE UUID: 82cac0e4-86de-49dd-b792-b930efb5c1b6

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 May 2011 10:33
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 03:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J. Wade
Author: H. Smith
Author: M. Hankins
Author: Carrie Llewellyn

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×