Basket weaving in Advanced level history ... how to plan and teach the 100 year study
Basket weaving in Advanced level history ... how to plan and teach the 100 year study
The current specifications for AS/A2 history require students to study change over a period of at least 100 years. Given that the 100 year study represents just one module out of six and also that it may not complement any of the other modules selected and may therefore be wholly unfamiliar to students, it raises some challenging questions about how to plan and teach it. It has certainly presented Advanced Level teachers with a new challenge, for even where they were previously teaching a theme over a long time span, they would almost certainly have had more time to do so. But perhaps it is this relative lack of time that frees us to be more creative and to draw meaningfully on current practice at Key Stage 3: there is not enough time to go into huge detail and it is the big pictures that are important. In this article, Richard Harris and Alison Kitson warn against an 'attritional' approach to content and suggest alternative ways of handling the 100 year unit which enable students to focus more on the patterns, the changes and the continuities than on the narrative of events. Through a discussion of both general principles and two specific case studies, they provide us with a rich source of specific, practical ideas about how to plan and teach this unit without drowning in content, running out of time and switching students off.
27-35
Harris, Richard
0550d258-245a-4d0f-b366-4a8bc580cda3
Kitson, Alison
49f40d5a-039b-4d36-a448-2a211c1d062f
December 2002
Harris, Richard
0550d258-245a-4d0f-b366-4a8bc580cda3
Kitson, Alison
49f40d5a-039b-4d36-a448-2a211c1d062f
Harris, Richard and Kitson, Alison
(2002)
Basket weaving in Advanced level history ... how to plan and teach the 100 year study.
Teaching History, 109, .
Abstract
The current specifications for AS/A2 history require students to study change over a period of at least 100 years. Given that the 100 year study represents just one module out of six and also that it may not complement any of the other modules selected and may therefore be wholly unfamiliar to students, it raises some challenging questions about how to plan and teach it. It has certainly presented Advanced Level teachers with a new challenge, for even where they were previously teaching a theme over a long time span, they would almost certainly have had more time to do so. But perhaps it is this relative lack of time that frees us to be more creative and to draw meaningfully on current practice at Key Stage 3: there is not enough time to go into huge detail and it is the big pictures that are important. In this article, Richard Harris and Alison Kitson warn against an 'attritional' approach to content and suggest alternative ways of handling the 100 year unit which enable students to focus more on the patterns, the changes and the continuities than on the narrative of events. Through a discussion of both general principles and two specific case studies, they provide us with a rich source of specific, practical ideas about how to plan and teach this unit without drowning in content, running out of time and switching students off.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: December 2002
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 18736
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18736
ISSN: 0040-0610
PURE UUID: 0abde504-153f-444c-bf05-37129c1bb038
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Nov 2005
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 14:20
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Richard Harris
Author:
Alison Kitson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics