The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Bypassing the selection rule in choosing controls for a case-control study

Record type: Article

Objectives It has been argued that in case–control studies, controls should be drawn from the base population that gives rise to the cases. In designing a study of occupational injury and risks arising from long-term illness and prescribed medication, we lacked data on subjects' occupation, without which employed cases (typically in manual occupations) would be compared with controls from the general population, including the unemployed and a higher proportion of white-collar professions. Collecting the missing data on occupation would be costly. We estimated the potential for bias if the selection rule were ignored.

Methods: We obtained published estimates of the frequencies of several exposures of interest (diabetes, mental health problems, asthma, coronary heart disease) in the general population, and of the relative risks of these diseases in unemployed versus employed individuals and in manual versus non-manual occupations. From these we computed the degree of over- or underestimation of exposure frequencies and exposure ORs if controls were selected from the general population.

Results: The potential bias in the OR was estimated as likely to fall between an underestimation of 14% and an overestimation of 36.7% (95th centiles). In fewer than 6% of simulations did the error exceed 30%, and in none did it reach 50%.

Conclusions: For the purposes of this study, in which we were interested only in substantial increases in risk, the potential for selection bias was judged acceptable. The rule that controls should come from the same base population as cases can justifiably be broken, at least in some circumstances.

PDF OEM_2010_Bypassing_selection_rule_in_cc_studies.pdf - Version of Record
Download (113kB)

Citation

Palmer, Keith T., Kim, Miranda and Coggon, David (2010) Bypassing the selection rule in choosing controls for a case-control study Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 67, (12), pp. 872-877. (doi:10.1136/oem.2009.050674). (PMID:20864466).

More information

Published date: December 2010

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 187999
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/187999
ISSN: 1351-0711
PURE UUID: 12d28025-ffa9-4dd7-9f4f-114ac7ca467d
ORCID for David Coggon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1930-3987

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 May 2011 13:18
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 11:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Keith T. Palmer
Author: Miranda Kim
Author: David Coggon ORCID iD

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×