The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Biologically generated habitat provision and diversity of rocky shore organisms at a hierarchy of spatial scales

Biologically generated habitat provision and diversity of rocky shore organisms at a hierarchy of spatial scales
Biologically generated habitat provision and diversity of rocky shore organisms at a hierarchy of spatial scales
The diversity and abundance of intertidal organisms found on moderately exposed shores were compared between biologically generated complex and less complex habitats at four different spatial scales. For macrobiota, comparisons were made between Fucus clumps and open areas (barnacle covered or bare rock) and then between barnacle covered rock and ‘bare’ rock. Microbiota were compared on barnacle plates and on the rock surface and at a finer resolution on the plates themselves and pits in the plates. Macrobiota were quantified at two levels of resolution by direct observation and under low power magnification. Microbiota were examined at two levels of resolution with a scanning electron microscope. For macrobiota the average number of species was significantly greater in complex habitats at both levels of resolution. The average number of individuals associated with the Fucus clumps was significantly lower than that on adjacent areas of barnacle covered and bare rock. However, the average number of individuals associated with the barnacle matrix was significantly greater than that on surrounding rock. The differences were entirely caused by a greater abundance of barnacles and species associated with the barnacle matrix on exposed rock outside the Fucus clumps. For microbiota there were large differences in species composition; cyanobacteria were predominant on the rock surface whilst diatoms dominated the barnacle plates. The diversity of this assemblage was low and no differences in species numbers were apparent between the two habitats. At a finer scale, abundance of individuals was much greater in the pits than on flat areas of the surrounding plates and there was a slightly elevated average number of species per sampling unit. This paper illustrates the importance of using a variety of resolutions to measure biodiversity and the importance of biological habitat provision in maintaining biodiversity.
Barnacles, Biodiversity, Fucus, Habitat complexity, Intertidal, Microalgae
0022-0981
73-84
Thompson, R.C.
d632e905-6f51-49a0-9426-13c42c3d0a18
Wilson, B.J.
3e6e4c08-b161-4878-93f3-725fe0557041
Tobin, M.L.
c2a71b79-c7cd-4195-9e4f-1c97328a8925
Hill, A.S.
bd878f76-1ea8-42e8-a6dc-e1327c0e01e8
Hawkins, S.J.
758fe1c1-30cd-4ed1-bb65-2471dc7c11fa
Thompson, R.C.
d632e905-6f51-49a0-9426-13c42c3d0a18
Wilson, B.J.
3e6e4c08-b161-4878-93f3-725fe0557041
Tobin, M.L.
c2a71b79-c7cd-4195-9e4f-1c97328a8925
Hill, A.S.
bd878f76-1ea8-42e8-a6dc-e1327c0e01e8
Hawkins, S.J.
758fe1c1-30cd-4ed1-bb65-2471dc7c11fa

Thompson, R.C., Wilson, B.J., Tobin, M.L., Hill, A.S. and Hawkins, S.J. (1996) Biologically generated habitat provision and diversity of rocky shore organisms at a hierarchy of spatial scales. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 202 (1), 73-84. (doi:10.1016/0022-0981(96)00032-9).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The diversity and abundance of intertidal organisms found on moderately exposed shores were compared between biologically generated complex and less complex habitats at four different spatial scales. For macrobiota, comparisons were made between Fucus clumps and open areas (barnacle covered or bare rock) and then between barnacle covered rock and ‘bare’ rock. Microbiota were compared on barnacle plates and on the rock surface and at a finer resolution on the plates themselves and pits in the plates. Macrobiota were quantified at two levels of resolution by direct observation and under low power magnification. Microbiota were examined at two levels of resolution with a scanning electron microscope. For macrobiota the average number of species was significantly greater in complex habitats at both levels of resolution. The average number of individuals associated with the Fucus clumps was significantly lower than that on adjacent areas of barnacle covered and bare rock. However, the average number of individuals associated with the barnacle matrix was significantly greater than that on surrounding rock. The differences were entirely caused by a greater abundance of barnacles and species associated with the barnacle matrix on exposed rock outside the Fucus clumps. For microbiota there were large differences in species composition; cyanobacteria were predominant on the rock surface whilst diatoms dominated the barnacle plates. The diversity of this assemblage was low and no differences in species numbers were apparent between the two habitats. At a finer scale, abundance of individuals was much greater in the pits than on flat areas of the surrounding plates and there was a slightly elevated average number of species per sampling unit. This paper illustrates the importance of using a variety of resolutions to measure biodiversity and the importance of biological habitat provision in maintaining biodiversity.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 15 September 1996
Keywords: Barnacles, Biodiversity, Fucus, Habitat complexity, Intertidal, Microalgae

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 188793
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/188793
ISSN: 0022-0981
PURE UUID: 5da2598d-b494-4b81-9aed-e59be4656b50

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 May 2011 12:54
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 03:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: R.C. Thompson
Author: B.J. Wilson
Author: M.L. Tobin
Author: A.S. Hill
Author: S.J. Hawkins

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×