The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Transport of mecoprop through Mercia Mudstone and Oxford Clay at the laboratory scale

Transport of mecoprop through Mercia Mudstone and Oxford Clay at the laboratory scale
Transport of mecoprop through Mercia Mudstone and Oxford Clay at the laboratory scale
Laboratory column tests have been carried out to assess the transport behaviour of Mecoprop in Mercia Mudstone clay and Oxford Clay. Artificially consolidated clay samples were compressed in a triaxial cell to stresses representative of those at the base of a landfill. Uniform steady flow was achieved, and there was no evidence of bypass flow in one or more fast streamtubes. Analysis of Mecoprop and Bromide breakthrough curves showed that the transport characteristics were linear (within noise), with no evidence of irreversible sorption. The possibility of dual-porosity or kinetic sorption processes were not conclusively eliminated. Truncated temporal moments allowed estimates of the linear retardation factor for Mecoprop, which were shown to be a lower-bound. Based on modelling, the retardation factor of Mecoprop in Oxford Clay was estimated to be 17.1, compared with 65.4 in batch sorption tests. The mean retardation factor for Mecoprop in Mercia Mudstone was 3.6, whereas the value from batch sorption tests was 10.0. These data confirm that retardation factors calculated from sorption isotherms obtained from batch experiments on disaggregated samples substantially over-estimate the retardation likely to be observed in compacted clay liners; therefore values from batch tests should be used with caution in groundwater risk assessments.
1470-9236
331-344
Woodman, N.
9870f75a-6d12-4815-84b8-6610e657a6ad
Stringfellow, A.
024efba8-7ffc-441e-a268-be43240990a9
Powrie, W.
600c3f02-00f8-4486-ae4b-b4fc8ec77c3c
Potter, H.A.B.
5ab69a22-2d42-4017-ae6d-49cd9d09299d
Simoes, A.
b619a7d9-6214-407f-9e95-67b0c4bc7278
Marcosanti, A.
55313f2b-92d7-4567-989a-388df92d7a49
Lazzarini, F.
00a37106-d2bb-4e99-8525-9d674bc891ba
Pavani, C.
00c75bbe-dfdb-4412-b2c5-7b0062711d7c
Woodman, N.
9870f75a-6d12-4815-84b8-6610e657a6ad
Stringfellow, A.
024efba8-7ffc-441e-a268-be43240990a9
Powrie, W.
600c3f02-00f8-4486-ae4b-b4fc8ec77c3c
Potter, H.A.B.
5ab69a22-2d42-4017-ae6d-49cd9d09299d
Simoes, A.
b619a7d9-6214-407f-9e95-67b0c4bc7278
Marcosanti, A.
55313f2b-92d7-4567-989a-388df92d7a49
Lazzarini, F.
00a37106-d2bb-4e99-8525-9d674bc891ba
Pavani, C.
00c75bbe-dfdb-4412-b2c5-7b0062711d7c

Woodman, N., Stringfellow, A., Powrie, W., Potter, H.A.B., Simoes, A., Marcosanti, A., Lazzarini, F. and Pavani, C. (2011) Transport of mecoprop through Mercia Mudstone and Oxford Clay at the laboratory scale. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 44 (3), 331-344. (doi:10.1144/1470-9236/08-097).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Laboratory column tests have been carried out to assess the transport behaviour of Mecoprop in Mercia Mudstone clay and Oxford Clay. Artificially consolidated clay samples were compressed in a triaxial cell to stresses representative of those at the base of a landfill. Uniform steady flow was achieved, and there was no evidence of bypass flow in one or more fast streamtubes. Analysis of Mecoprop and Bromide breakthrough curves showed that the transport characteristics were linear (within noise), with no evidence of irreversible sorption. The possibility of dual-porosity or kinetic sorption processes were not conclusively eliminated. Truncated temporal moments allowed estimates of the linear retardation factor for Mecoprop, which were shown to be a lower-bound. Based on modelling, the retardation factor of Mecoprop in Oxford Clay was estimated to be 17.1, compared with 65.4 in batch sorption tests. The mean retardation factor for Mecoprop in Mercia Mudstone was 3.6, whereas the value from batch sorption tests was 10.0. These data confirm that retardation factors calculated from sorption isotherms obtained from batch experiments on disaggregated samples substantially over-estimate the retardation likely to be observed in compacted clay liners; therefore values from batch tests should be used with caution in groundwater risk assessments.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: August 2011

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 189087
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/189087
ISSN: 1470-9236
PURE UUID: c9f8d0d8-81d6-441a-849c-a79b01a6db83
ORCID for N. Woodman: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5571-0451
ORCID for A. Stringfellow: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8873-0010
ORCID for W. Powrie: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-0826

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 May 2011 10:52
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:28

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: N. Woodman ORCID iD
Author: A. Stringfellow ORCID iD
Author: W. Powrie ORCID iD
Author: H.A.B. Potter
Author: A. Simoes
Author: A. Marcosanti
Author: F. Lazzarini
Author: C. Pavani

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×