Quantifying nanoparticle dispersion: application of the Delaunay network for objective analysis of sample micrographs
Quantifying nanoparticle dispersion: application of the Delaunay network for objective analysis of sample micrographs
Measuring quantitatively the nanoparticle dispersion of a composite material requires more than choosing a particular parameter and determining its correspondence to good and bad dispersion. It additionally requires anticipation of the measure’s behaviour towards imperfect experimental data, such as that which can be obtained from a limited number of samples. It should be recognised that different samples from a common parent population can give statistically different responses due to sample variation alone and a measure of the likelihood of this occurring allows a decision on the dispersion to be made. It is also important to factor into the analysis the quality of the data in the micrograph with it: (a) being incomplete because some of the particles present in the micrograph are indistinguishable or go unseen; (b) including additional responses which are false. With the use of our preferred method, this article investigates the effects on the measured dispersion quality of nanoparticles of the micrograph’s magnification settings, the role of the fraction of nanoparticles visible and the number of micrographs used. It is demonstrated that the best choice of magnification, which gives the clearest indication of dispersion type, is dependent on the type of nanoparticle structure present. Furthermore, it is found that the measured dispersion can be modified by particle loss, through the limitations of micrograph construction, and material/microscope imperfections such as cut marks and optical aberrations which could lead to the wrong conclusions being drawn. The article finishes by showing the versatility of the dispersion measure by characterising various different spatial features.
Bray, D.J.
c7bce496-6644-4b78-b745-aa967b7298d4
Gilmour, S.G.
984dbefa-893b-444d-9aa2-5953cd1c8b03
Guild, F.J.
8b420989-1fb1-45f2-80d2-b96bf770981a
Hsieh, T.H.
45d52c49-c40c-4f11-ad9b-c241b151da38
Masania, K.
10cf6459-ae4a-4df8-838a-b71980a54b19
Taylor, A.C.
fe53d1f3-91c1-46a2-b9a4-97dee6693323
1 June 2011
Bray, D.J.
c7bce496-6644-4b78-b745-aa967b7298d4
Gilmour, S.G.
984dbefa-893b-444d-9aa2-5953cd1c8b03
Guild, F.J.
8b420989-1fb1-45f2-80d2-b96bf770981a
Hsieh, T.H.
45d52c49-c40c-4f11-ad9b-c241b151da38
Masania, K.
10cf6459-ae4a-4df8-838a-b71980a54b19
Taylor, A.C.
fe53d1f3-91c1-46a2-b9a4-97dee6693323
Bray, D.J., Gilmour, S.G., Guild, F.J., Hsieh, T.H., Masania, K. and Taylor, A.C.
(2011)
Quantifying nanoparticle dispersion: application of the Delaunay network for objective analysis of sample micrographs.
Journal of Materials Science.
(doi:10.1007/s10853-011-5615-4).
Abstract
Measuring quantitatively the nanoparticle dispersion of a composite material requires more than choosing a particular parameter and determining its correspondence to good and bad dispersion. It additionally requires anticipation of the measure’s behaviour towards imperfect experimental data, such as that which can be obtained from a limited number of samples. It should be recognised that different samples from a common parent population can give statistically different responses due to sample variation alone and a measure of the likelihood of this occurring allows a decision on the dispersion to be made. It is also important to factor into the analysis the quality of the data in the micrograph with it: (a) being incomplete because some of the particles present in the micrograph are indistinguishable or go unseen; (b) including additional responses which are false. With the use of our preferred method, this article investigates the effects on the measured dispersion quality of nanoparticles of the micrograph’s magnification settings, the role of the fraction of nanoparticles visible and the number of micrographs used. It is demonstrated that the best choice of magnification, which gives the clearest indication of dispersion type, is dependent on the type of nanoparticle structure present. Furthermore, it is found that the measured dispersion can be modified by particle loss, through the limitations of micrograph construction, and material/microscope imperfections such as cut marks and optical aberrations which could lead to the wrong conclusions being drawn. The article finishes by showing the versatility of the dispersion measure by characterising various different spatial features.
Text
JMS2011.pdf
- Author's Original
More information
Published date: 1 June 2011
Additional Information:
Funded by EPSRC: Feasibility Study Statistical Modelling of Microstructural Variables in Particulate Filled Composite Materials (EP/H00582X/1)
Organisations:
Statistics
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 189643
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/189643
ISSN: 0022-2461
PURE UUID: 82771989-4b73-4709-ab13-6d8f33cd4c1c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Jun 2011 12:34
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 03:36
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
D.J. Bray
Author:
S.G. Gilmour
Author:
F.J. Guild
Author:
T.H. Hsieh
Author:
K. Masania
Author:
A.C. Taylor
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics