The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Quantifying nanoparticle dispersion: application of the Delaunay network for objective analysis of sample micrographs

Bray, D.J., Gilmour, S.G., Guild, F.J., Hsieh, T.H., Masania, K. and Taylor, A.C. (2011) Quantifying nanoparticle dispersion: application of the Delaunay network for objective analysis of sample micrographs Journal of Materials Science (doi:10.1007/s10853-011-5615-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Measuring quantitatively the nanoparticle dispersion of a composite material requires more than choosing a particular parameter and determining its correspondence to good and bad dispersion. It additionally requires anticipation of the measure’s behaviour towards imperfect experimental data, such as that which can be obtained from a limited number of samples. It should be recognised that different samples from a common parent population can give statistically different responses due to sample variation alone and a measure of the likelihood of this occurring allows a decision on the dispersion to be made. It is also important to factor into the analysis the quality of the data in the micrograph with it: (a) being incomplete because some of the particles present in the micrograph are indistinguishable or go unseen; (b) including additional responses which are false. With the use of our preferred method, this article investigates the effects on the measured dispersion quality of nanoparticles of the micrograph’s magnification settings, the role of the fraction of nanoparticles visible and the number of micrographs used. It is demonstrated that the best choice of magnification, which gives the clearest indication of dispersion type, is dependent on the type of nanoparticle structure present. Furthermore, it is found that the measured dispersion can be modified by particle loss, through the limitations of micrograph construction, and material/microscope imperfections such as cut marks and optical aberrations which could lead to the wrong conclusions being drawn. The article finishes by showing the versatility of the dispersion measure by characterising various different spatial features.

PDF JMS2011.pdf - Author's Original
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: 1 June 2011
Organisations: Statistics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 189643
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/189643
ISSN: 0022-2461
PURE UUID: 82771989-4b73-4709-ab13-6d8f33cd4c1c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Jun 2011 12:34
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 11:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: D.J. Bray
Author: S.G. Gilmour
Author: F.J. Guild
Author: T.H. Hsieh
Author: K. Masania
Author: A.C. Taylor

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×