The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Exploring the relationship between anxiety and processing capacity for threat detection

Exploring the relationship between anxiety and processing capacity for threat detection
Exploring the relationship between anxiety and processing capacity for threat detection
Cognitive models suggest that anxiety is associated with the presence of a highly sensitised threat detection mechanism which, once activated, leads to the automatic allocation and focusing of attention on the source of threat (review by Bar-Haim, Lamy, Pergamin, Bakermans-Kranenburg & Ijzendoorn, 2007). Previous studies have only ever considered the detection of singleton threat targets in anxiety. The threat detection system should also be configured to rapidly detect signs of impending danger in situations where there is a possibility of multiple threats. Given multiple threats, it is unclear whether a more advantageous strategy for threat detection in anxious individuals is to localise and focus attention on one threat stimulus or to distribute attention widely (see Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos & Calvo, 2007). To address this theoretical question, we conducted a reaction time redundant signals study in which participants were asked to indicate the presence or absence of an angry or happy target face in displays containing no targets, one target or two targets. In all conditions, the task was to detect the presence of at least one target. We used measures of processing capacity (e.g., capacity coefficient, Miller and Grice inequalities; see Wenger & Townsend, 2000) to assess whether, at all time points, the fastest RTs in the redundant target condition (e.g., two target condition) could be predicted from the fastest RTs in the single target conditions. Eye-movements were also measured during the study. Significant correlations showed that anxiety was associated with increased processing capacity for threatening faces but only at early time points in target detection. The results also demonstrated that significantly fewer eye-movements were made to targets when anxiety was high. The data are consistent with anxiety influencing threat detection via a broadly tuned attentional mechanism.

1534-7362
254
Richards, Helen
1b6ae149-cf71-4378-9574-61bf6616f3e0
Benson, Valerie
4827cede-6668-4e3d-bded-ade4cd5e5db5
Hadwin, Julie A.
a364caf0-405a-42f3-a04c-4864817393ee
Wenger, Michael J.
af117fc0-610a-460e-bd72-57978ffcf61b
Donnelly, Nick
05c83b6b-ee8d-4c9d-85dc-c5dcd6b5427b
Richards, Helen
1b6ae149-cf71-4378-9574-61bf6616f3e0
Benson, Valerie
4827cede-6668-4e3d-bded-ade4cd5e5db5
Hadwin, Julie A.
a364caf0-405a-42f3-a04c-4864817393ee
Wenger, Michael J.
af117fc0-610a-460e-bd72-57978ffcf61b
Donnelly, Nick
05c83b6b-ee8d-4c9d-85dc-c5dcd6b5427b

Richards, Helen, Benson, Valerie, Hadwin, Julie A., Wenger, Michael J. and Donnelly, Nick (2010) Exploring the relationship between anxiety and processing capacity for threat detection. Journal of Vision, 10 (7), 254. (doi:10.1167/10.7.254).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Cognitive models suggest that anxiety is associated with the presence of a highly sensitised threat detection mechanism which, once activated, leads to the automatic allocation and focusing of attention on the source of threat (review by Bar-Haim, Lamy, Pergamin, Bakermans-Kranenburg & Ijzendoorn, 2007). Previous studies have only ever considered the detection of singleton threat targets in anxiety. The threat detection system should also be configured to rapidly detect signs of impending danger in situations where there is a possibility of multiple threats. Given multiple threats, it is unclear whether a more advantageous strategy for threat detection in anxious individuals is to localise and focus attention on one threat stimulus or to distribute attention widely (see Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos & Calvo, 2007). To address this theoretical question, we conducted a reaction time redundant signals study in which participants were asked to indicate the presence or absence of an angry or happy target face in displays containing no targets, one target or two targets. In all conditions, the task was to detect the presence of at least one target. We used measures of processing capacity (e.g., capacity coefficient, Miller and Grice inequalities; see Wenger & Townsend, 2000) to assess whether, at all time points, the fastest RTs in the redundant target condition (e.g., two target condition) could be predicted from the fastest RTs in the single target conditions. Eye-movements were also measured during the study. Significant correlations showed that anxiety was associated with increased processing capacity for threatening faces but only at early time points in target detection. The results also demonstrated that significantly fewer eye-movements were made to targets when anxiety was high. The data are consistent with anxiety influencing threat detection via a broadly tuned attentional mechanism.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2010

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 191457
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/191457
ISSN: 1534-7362
PURE UUID: d394ac6a-0c6b-4dbf-94d7-30e2f2febd80

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Jun 2011 13:02
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 03:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Helen Richards
Author: Valerie Benson
Author: Julie A. Hadwin
Author: Michael J. Wenger
Author: Nick Donnelly

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×