Making monitoring ‘work’: human-machine interaction and patient safety in anaesthesia
Making monitoring ‘work’: human-machine interaction and patient safety in anaesthesia
This study aimed to explore the use of electronic monitoring within the context of anaesthetic practice. We conducted workplace observation of, and interviews with, anaesthetists and other anaesthetic staff in two UK hospitals. Transcripts were analysed inductively for recurrent themes. Whilst formal sources of knowledge in anaesthesia deal with the issue of monitoring in terms of theoretical principles and performance specifications of devices, anaesthetists in practice often 'disbelieve' monitoring information. They call on and integrate other sources of knowledge about the patient, especially from their clinical assessment. The ability to distinguish 'normal' and 'abnormal' findings is vital. Confidence in electronic information varies with experience, as does the degree to which electronic information may be considered 'redundant'. We conclude that electronic monitoring brings new dimensions of understanding but also the potential for new ways of misunderstanding. The tacit knowledge underlying the safe use of monitoring deserves greater acknowledgement in training and practice.
electronic monitoring, anaesthesia education, professional expertise, monitoring technology, qualitative methods, patient safety
1070-7078
Smith, A.F.
628d52dc-ef76-40b6-9b86-7c809392878d
Mort, M.
0c5eea61-4f65-4520-92bd-7b4ead7e1247
Pope, C.
537319b8-553d-4ffd-a9da-7cd840e7a829
November 2003
Smith, A.F.
628d52dc-ef76-40b6-9b86-7c809392878d
Mort, M.
0c5eea61-4f65-4520-92bd-7b4ead7e1247
Pope, C.
537319b8-553d-4ffd-a9da-7cd840e7a829
Smith, A.F., Mort, M. and Pope, C.
(2003)
Making monitoring ‘work’: human-machine interaction and patient safety in anaesthesia.
Anaesthesia, 58 (11), .
(doi:10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03404.x).
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the use of electronic monitoring within the context of anaesthetic practice. We conducted workplace observation of, and interviews with, anaesthetists and other anaesthetic staff in two UK hospitals. Transcripts were analysed inductively for recurrent themes. Whilst formal sources of knowledge in anaesthesia deal with the issue of monitoring in terms of theoretical principles and performance specifications of devices, anaesthetists in practice often 'disbelieve' monitoring information. They call on and integrate other sources of knowledge about the patient, especially from their clinical assessment. The ability to distinguish 'normal' and 'abnormal' findings is vital. Confidence in electronic information varies with experience, as does the degree to which electronic information may be considered 'redundant'. We conclude that electronic monitoring brings new dimensions of understanding but also the potential for new ways of misunderstanding. The tacit knowledge underlying the safe use of monitoring deserves greater acknowledgement in training and practice.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: November 2003
Keywords:
electronic monitoring, anaesthesia education, professional expertise, monitoring technology, qualitative methods, patient safety
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 19214
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/19214
ISSN: 0003-2409
PURE UUID: 5dc88801-c7f5-4317-a739-90fe3247cbe0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 31 Jan 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:12
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
A.F. Smith
Author:
M. Mort
Author:
C. Pope
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics