The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Expertise in practice: An ethnographic study exploring acquisition and use of knowledge in anaesthesia

Expertise in practice: An ethnographic study exploring acquisition and use of knowledge in anaesthesia
Expertise in practice: An ethnographic study exploring acquisition and use of knowledge in anaesthesia
Background. Expert professional practice in any field is known to rely on both explicit (formal) and tacit (personal) forms of knowledge. Current anaesthetic training programmes appear to favour explicit knowledge and measurable competencies. We aimed to describe and explore the way different types of knowledge are learned and used in anaesthetic practice.Method. Qualitative approach using non-participant observation of, and semi-structured interviews with, anaesthetic staff in two English hospitals.Results. The development of expertise in anaesthesia rests on the ability to reconcile and interpret many sources of knowledge—clinical, social, electronic, and experiential—and formal theoretical learning. Experts have mastered technical skills but are also able to understand the dynamic and uncertain condition of the anaesthetized patient and respond to changes in it. This expertise is acquired by working with colleagues, and, importantly, by working independently, to develop personal routines. Routines mark the successful incorporation of new knowledge but also function as a defence against the inherent uncertainty of anaesthetic practice. The habits seen in experts’ routines are preferred ways of working chosen from a larger repertoire of techniques which can also be mobilized as changing circumstances demand.Conclusions. Opportunities for developing expertise are linked to the independent development of personal routines. Evidence-based approaches to professional practice may obscure the role played by the interpretation of knowledge. We suggest that the restriction of apprenticeship-style training threatens the acquisition of anaesthetic expertise as defined in this paper.
anaesthesia education, anaesthestist competence
0007-0912
319-328
Smith, A.
f115f8cb-6c76-444b-ba80-7a1d54276da8
Goodwin, D.
44ea5b5f-3933-4171-83b6-8d48928e27ca
Mort, M.
0c5eea61-4f65-4520-92bd-7b4ead7e1247
Pope, C.
537319b8-553d-4ffd-a9da-7cd840e7a829
Smith, A.
f115f8cb-6c76-444b-ba80-7a1d54276da8
Goodwin, D.
44ea5b5f-3933-4171-83b6-8d48928e27ca
Mort, M.
0c5eea61-4f65-4520-92bd-7b4ead7e1247
Pope, C.
537319b8-553d-4ffd-a9da-7cd840e7a829

Smith, A., Goodwin, D., Mort, M. and Pope, C. (2003) Expertise in practice: An ethnographic study exploring acquisition and use of knowledge in anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 91 (3), 319-328. (doi:10.1093/bja/aeg180).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background. Expert professional practice in any field is known to rely on both explicit (formal) and tacit (personal) forms of knowledge. Current anaesthetic training programmes appear to favour explicit knowledge and measurable competencies. We aimed to describe and explore the way different types of knowledge are learned and used in anaesthetic practice.Method. Qualitative approach using non-participant observation of, and semi-structured interviews with, anaesthetic staff in two English hospitals.Results. The development of expertise in anaesthesia rests on the ability to reconcile and interpret many sources of knowledge—clinical, social, electronic, and experiential—and formal theoretical learning. Experts have mastered technical skills but are also able to understand the dynamic and uncertain condition of the anaesthetized patient and respond to changes in it. This expertise is acquired by working with colleagues, and, importantly, by working independently, to develop personal routines. Routines mark the successful incorporation of new knowledge but also function as a defence against the inherent uncertainty of anaesthetic practice. The habits seen in experts’ routines are preferred ways of working chosen from a larger repertoire of techniques which can also be mobilized as changing circumstances demand.Conclusions. Opportunities for developing expertise are linked to the independent development of personal routines. Evidence-based approaches to professional practice may obscure the role played by the interpretation of knowledge. We suggest that the restriction of apprenticeship-style training threatens the acquisition of anaesthetic expertise as defined in this paper.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2003
Keywords: anaesthesia education, anaesthestist competence

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 19216
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/19216
ISSN: 0007-0912
PURE UUID: 02ef10c1-3496-4933-9874-bdf4e4a818e3

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Jan 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:12

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A. Smith
Author: D. Goodwin
Author: M. Mort
Author: C. Pope

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×