Are Academics in Kazakhstan capable of self-regulation?
Are Academics in Kazakhstan capable of self-regulation?
This paper investigates the state and structure of professional norms in the context of undergraduate teaching in a university in Kazakhstan. The purpose is to understand the belief system held by academics with regards to their professional duties in the context of teaching. Evidence of such normative structure would suggest that Kazak academic profession holds potential for effective and ethical self-regulation, its absence would raise a red flag for university administrators and policy makers. In order to place our findings in the meaningful context, we compare the normative structure in Kazakhstan to that of US academic profession previously studies by Braxton and Bayer (1999). We find that academics in Kazakhstan adhere to a normative structure which is quite similar to, although somewhat more relaxed than, that of US professors. We discuss the implications of these findings and empirical evidence for academic corruption in the context of decentralisation reforms and authority devolution.
higher education policy/development, institutional performance measures, management, academic profession, professional norms, corruption in education
1-16
Rumyantseva, Nataliya L.
3f8e4509-2ff8-4bae-8c98-4729be90a76c
Caboni, Timothy C.
5a8a661e-6ca7-4291-939f-e87ea66367d0
March 2012
Rumyantseva, Nataliya L.
3f8e4509-2ff8-4bae-8c98-4729be90a76c
Caboni, Timothy C.
5a8a661e-6ca7-4291-939f-e87ea66367d0
Rumyantseva, Nataliya L. and Caboni, Timothy C.
(2012)
Are Academics in Kazakhstan capable of self-regulation?
Tertiary Education and Management, 18 (1), .
(doi:10.1080/13583883.2011.597057).
Abstract
This paper investigates the state and structure of professional norms in the context of undergraduate teaching in a university in Kazakhstan. The purpose is to understand the belief system held by academics with regards to their professional duties in the context of teaching. Evidence of such normative structure would suggest that Kazak academic profession holds potential for effective and ethical self-regulation, its absence would raise a red flag for university administrators and policy makers. In order to place our findings in the meaningful context, we compare the normative structure in Kazakhstan to that of US academic profession previously studies by Braxton and Bayer (1999). We find that academics in Kazakhstan adhere to a normative structure which is quite similar to, although somewhat more relaxed than, that of US professors. We discuss the implications of these findings and empirical evidence for academic corruption in the context of decentralisation reforms and authority devolution.
Text
Rumyantseva_and_Caboni.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 February 2012
Published date: March 2012
Keywords:
higher education policy/development, institutional performance measures, management, academic profession, professional norms, corruption in education
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 192571
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/192571
ISSN: 1358-3883
PURE UUID: 39de4c2e-9707-464a-b47b-4fc12b17c3d6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Jul 2011 08:12
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 03:51
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nataliya L. Rumyantseva
Author:
Timothy C. Caboni
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics