A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of the H2S test versus indicator bacteria tests for faecal contamination of water
A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of the H2S test versus indicator bacteria tests for faecal contamination of water
The H2S test, a simple, low-cost field test, is used in many remote and developing country settings to test for the faecal contamination of drinking-water. However, its diagnostic accuracy remains uncertain. To provide more guidance on its use, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the H2S test versus indicator bacterial tests for E. coli or thermotolerant coliforms (TTC). We screened 661 abstracts and identified 51 relevant studies based on 13,853 water samples. The overall test sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) was 0.87 (0.80-0.92) and 0.82 (0.72-0.90) relative to TTC and 0.88 (0.77-0.94) and 0.75 (0.55–0.88) relative to E. coli tests. The test’s diagnostic accuracy varied significantly and substantially between studies. Little of this variation was explained by testing procedures, study quality or the nature of the samples processed. We recommended that users should benchmark its accuracy before using in a new setting.
Wright, Jim
94990ecf-f8dd-4649-84f2-b28bf272e464
Yang, Hong
2ea2c94c-8d28-4555-98f9-59b615b0cee7
Walker, Kate
93c5a20a-82a2-45b3-a295-479de3f64156
Pedley, Steve
4ad4d2f3-3e70-4f82-8b3b-c2d2f2b5df5a
Elliott, John
589c5ac2-c67e-4eb1-aa07-c07583997af5
Gundry, Stephen
7146591d-c1c8-4160-96a6-26d5ce136ab6
July 2011
Wright, Jim
94990ecf-f8dd-4649-84f2-b28bf272e464
Yang, Hong
2ea2c94c-8d28-4555-98f9-59b615b0cee7
Walker, Kate
93c5a20a-82a2-45b3-a295-479de3f64156
Pedley, Steve
4ad4d2f3-3e70-4f82-8b3b-c2d2f2b5df5a
Elliott, John
589c5ac2-c67e-4eb1-aa07-c07583997af5
Gundry, Stephen
7146591d-c1c8-4160-96a6-26d5ce136ab6
Wright, Jim, Yang, Hong, Walker, Kate, Pedley, Steve, Elliott, John and Gundry, Stephen
(2011)
A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of the H2S test versus indicator bacteria tests for faecal contamination of water.
Singapore International Water Week, Water Convention 2011.
03 - 07 Jul 2011.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Poster)
Abstract
The H2S test, a simple, low-cost field test, is used in many remote and developing country settings to test for the faecal contamination of drinking-water. However, its diagnostic accuracy remains uncertain. To provide more guidance on its use, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the H2S test versus indicator bacterial tests for E. coli or thermotolerant coliforms (TTC). We screened 661 abstracts and identified 51 relevant studies based on 13,853 water samples. The overall test sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) was 0.87 (0.80-0.92) and 0.82 (0.72-0.90) relative to TTC and 0.88 (0.77-0.94) and 0.75 (0.55–0.88) relative to E. coli tests. The test’s diagnostic accuracy varied significantly and substantially between studies. Little of this variation was explained by testing procedures, study quality or the nature of the samples processed. We recommended that users should benchmark its accuracy before using in a new setting.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: July 2011
Venue - Dates:
Singapore International Water Week, Water Convention 2011, 2011-07-03 - 2011-07-07
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 193329
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/193329
PURE UUID: 47d55a1a-63c6-4a57-82b8-044501eb5272
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Jul 2011 12:13
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 04:00
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Hong Yang
Author:
Kate Walker
Author:
Steve Pedley
Author:
John Elliott
Author:
Stephen Gundry
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics