The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Effect of questionnaire length, personalization and reminder type on response rate to a complex postal survey: randomized controlled trial

Record type: Article

Background

Minimising participant non-response in postal surveys helps to maximise the generalisability of the inferences made from the data collected. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of questionnaire length, personalisation and reminder type on postal survey response rate and quality and to compare the cost-effectiveness of the alternative survey strategies.
Methods

In a pilot study for a population study of travel behaviour, physical activity and the environment, 1000 participants sampled from the UK edited electoral register were randomly allocated using a 2 × 2 factorial design to receive one of four survey packs: a personally addressed long (24 page) questionnaire pack, a personally addressed short (15 page) questionnaire pack, a non-personally addressed long questionnaire pack or a non-personally addressed short questionnaire pack. Those who did not return a questionnaire were stratified by initial randomisation group and further randomised to receive either a full reminder pack or a reminder postcard. The effects of the survey design factors on response were examined using multivariate logistic regression.
Results

An overall response rate of 17% was achieved. Participants who received the short version of the questionnaire were more likely to respond (OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.07). In those participants who received a reminder, personalisation of the survey pack and reminder also increased the odds of response (OR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.95). Item non-response was relatively low, but was significantly higher in the long questionnaire than the short (9.8% vs 5.8%; p = .04). The cost per additional usable questionnaire returned of issuing the reminder packs was £23.1 compared with £11.3 for the reminder postcards.
Conclusions

In contrast to some previous studies of shorter questionnaires, this trial found that shortening a relatively lengthy questionnaire significantly increased the response. Researchers should consider the trade off between the value of additional questions and a larger sample. If low response rates are expected, personalisation may be an important strategy to apply. Sending a full reminder pack to non-respondents appears a worthwhile, albeit more costly, strategy.

PDF BMC_methodology.pdf - Other
Download (328kB)

Citation

Sahlqvist, S.L., Song, Y., Bull, Fiona, Adams, E., Preston, John M. and Ogilvie, David (2011) Effect of questionnaire length, personalization and reminder type on response rate to a complex postal survey: randomized controlled trial BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, p. 62. (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-62).

More information

Published date: 6 May 2011
Organisations: Transportation Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 195201
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/195201
ISSN: 1471-2288
PURE UUID: a585bc89-fa62-42d2-bda4-9be2d94465d9
ORCID for John M. Preston: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6866-049X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Aug 2011 12:14
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 11:25

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S.L. Sahlqvist
Author: Y. Song
Author: Fiona Bull
Author: E. Adams
Author: John M. Preston ORCID iD
Author: David Ogilvie

University divisions


Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×