Which types of strategic corporate philanthropy lead to higher moral capital?
Which types of strategic corporate philanthropy lead to higher moral capital?
The purpose of this research paper is to identify which types of corporate philanthropy (CP): cause-related marketing (CRM) or sponsorship, create higher moral capital under two conditions: proactive or reactive (following a scandal). Results showed that CP created higher moral capital for a proactive company than for a reactive company. Both CRM and sponsorship were perceived as more sincere in the proactive company than the reactive company. However, CRM was seen as self-serving in the reactive company, but not the proactive company. The study demonstrated that companies need to take into account the different types of CP, as it has an effect on their moral capital. Socially proactive firms should engage in both CRM and sponsorship philanthropy, as both types can generate high moral capital, which creates better company reputation. However, CP may not be the most effective or appropriate strategy for creating moral capital following negative publicity.
Baden, Denise
daad83b9-c537-4d3c-bab6-548b841f23b5
Meyer, Edgar
f2e4fe13-ba46-43e7-99e1-979cf3983c64
Tonne, Marianna
28a5a416-7d36-44cd-af02-5bde9d9f55eb
June 2011
Baden, Denise
daad83b9-c537-4d3c-bab6-548b841f23b5
Meyer, Edgar
f2e4fe13-ba46-43e7-99e1-979cf3983c64
Tonne, Marianna
28a5a416-7d36-44cd-af02-5bde9d9f55eb
Baden, Denise, Meyer, Edgar and Tonne, Marianna
(2011)
Which types of strategic corporate philanthropy lead to higher moral capital?
22nd Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society (IABS) "Modern Slavery? Well Being in the 21st Century Workplace", Bath, United Kingdom.
23 - 26 Jun 2011.
12 pp
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
The purpose of this research paper is to identify which types of corporate philanthropy (CP): cause-related marketing (CRM) or sponsorship, create higher moral capital under two conditions: proactive or reactive (following a scandal). Results showed that CP created higher moral capital for a proactive company than for a reactive company. Both CRM and sponsorship were perceived as more sincere in the proactive company than the reactive company. However, CRM was seen as self-serving in the reactive company, but not the proactive company. The study demonstrated that companies need to take into account the different types of CP, as it has an effect on their moral capital. Socially proactive firms should engage in both CRM and sponsorship philanthropy, as both types can generate high moral capital, which creates better company reputation. However, CP may not be the most effective or appropriate strategy for creating moral capital following negative publicity.
Text
Strategic_corp_phil_paper_iabs_proceedings_final.docx
- Other
More information
Published date: June 2011
Venue - Dates:
22nd Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society (IABS) "Modern Slavery? Well Being in the 21st Century Workplace", Bath, United Kingdom, 2011-06-23 - 2011-06-26
Organisations:
HRM and Organisational Behaviour
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 195455
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/195455
PURE UUID: 1c7a5e6b-424b-405c-87ed-d9824e0833cb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Aug 2011 08:37
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:57
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Edgar Meyer
Author:
Marianna Tonne
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics