Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements during reading
Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements during reading
Parafoveal-on-foveal effects refer to the possibility that processing of the parafoveal word can influence the fixation durations on the foveal word during reading. In this Chapter, I will review the literature of studies examining this issue. Effects observed in reading-like tasks have been questioned on methodological grounds with regards to the generalisibility to normal reading. The clearest evidence for the existence of parafoveal-on-foveal effects comes from experiments allowing tight control over the stimuli but restricting the observations to fixation locations very close to the parafoveal word, and from corpus studies showing reliable but numerically small effects. I will make the claim that with regards to taking reported parafoveal-on-foveal effects as evidence for parallel lexical processing, the jury is still out. The argument is that as long as parafoveal-on-foveal effects are numerically small and difficult to replicate in a controlled experiment, they can be explained on the basis of mislocated fixations, machine error and binocular disparity. These latter three influences can create apparent parafoveal-on-foveal effects without being linked to parallel lexical processing.
9780199539789
839-855
Drieghe, Denis
dfe41922-1cea-47f4-904b-26d5c9fe85ce
2011
Drieghe, Denis
dfe41922-1cea-47f4-904b-26d5c9fe85ce
Drieghe, Denis
(2011)
Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements during reading.
In,
Liversedge, Simon, Gilchrist, Iain and Everling, Stefan
(eds.)
Oxford Handbook on Eye Movements.
(Oxford Library of Psychology)
Oxford, GB.
Oxford University Press, .
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
Parafoveal-on-foveal effects refer to the possibility that processing of the parafoveal word can influence the fixation durations on the foveal word during reading. In this Chapter, I will review the literature of studies examining this issue. Effects observed in reading-like tasks have been questioned on methodological grounds with regards to the generalisibility to normal reading. The clearest evidence for the existence of parafoveal-on-foveal effects comes from experiments allowing tight control over the stimuli but restricting the observations to fixation locations very close to the parafoveal word, and from corpus studies showing reliable but numerically small effects. I will make the claim that with regards to taking reported parafoveal-on-foveal effects as evidence for parallel lexical processing, the jury is still out. The argument is that as long as parafoveal-on-foveal effects are numerically small and difficult to replicate in a controlled experiment, they can be explained on the basis of mislocated fixations, machine error and binocular disparity. These latter three influences can create apparent parafoveal-on-foveal effects without being linked to parallel lexical processing.
Text
Chapter_Drieghe.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 2011
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 195817
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/195817
ISBN: 9780199539789
PURE UUID: aed7a33d-8bb1-4cfc-96c3-d988f713e8eb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Aug 2011 09:29
Last modified: 13 Sep 2024 01:43
Export record
Contributors
Editor:
Simon Liversedge
Editor:
Iain Gilchrist
Editor:
Stefan Everling
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
