The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

I have taken my umbrella, so of course it does not rain

I have taken my umbrella, so of course it does not rain
I have taken my umbrella, so of course it does not rain
Spirometry is used worldwide to diagnose respiratory disease, and it is a validated measure to assess airway obstruction. Irreversible airway obstruction is the defining feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thus, an FEV1/FVC ratio <70% is used to diagnose COPD, and the severity is thereafter based on the level of FEV1. This definition is widely used in clinical practice and research, yet may lead to confusion with respect to the diagnosis associated with the presence of airway obstruction. The three main reasons are the following: (1) fixed airflow obstruction may be the result of specific diagnoses such as cystic fibrosis; (2) FEV1/FVC ratio changes with ageing, and it is therefore inappropriate to use the same ratio at 40 and 90 years, leaving aside gender differences; (3) even when specific diagnoses are excluded, fixed airflow obstruction may be the end-stage of many different underlying processes. The authors believe that they have strong arguments that a COPD diagnosis based solely on spirometric values is nonsense. More sophisticated lung function tests, such as plethysmography, forced oscillation and lung clearance index, may help further to delineate the characteristics of low lung function. However, these are not feasible in most clinical contexts and in epidemiologic studies. Therefore, the authors throw down the gauntlet: spirometry is an essential tool in patient evaluation but dangerous for disease diagnosis, and the term COPD should only be used in the appropriate clinical (diagnostic) context.

0040-6376
88-89
Postma, D.S.
cbb4466d-4e7a-4c0f-b9df-7c19c4d31016
Brusselle, G.
6a11c83d-d4a3-4e2f-8eb3-10816201b182
Bush, A.
010aeb4e-ec67-4a69-bf15-c722a3b6354f
Holloway, J.W.
4bbd77e6-c095-445d-a36b-a50a72f6fe1a
Postma, D.S.
cbb4466d-4e7a-4c0f-b9df-7c19c4d31016
Brusselle, G.
6a11c83d-d4a3-4e2f-8eb3-10816201b182
Bush, A.
010aeb4e-ec67-4a69-bf15-c722a3b6354f
Holloway, J.W.
4bbd77e6-c095-445d-a36b-a50a72f6fe1a

Postma, D.S., Brusselle, G., Bush, A. and Holloway, J.W. (2012) I have taken my umbrella, so of course it does not rain. Thorax, 67 (1), 88-89. (doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200758). (PMID:21873323)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Spirometry is used worldwide to diagnose respiratory disease, and it is a validated measure to assess airway obstruction. Irreversible airway obstruction is the defining feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thus, an FEV1/FVC ratio <70% is used to diagnose COPD, and the severity is thereafter based on the level of FEV1. This definition is widely used in clinical practice and research, yet may lead to confusion with respect to the diagnosis associated with the presence of airway obstruction. The three main reasons are the following: (1) fixed airflow obstruction may be the result of specific diagnoses such as cystic fibrosis; (2) FEV1/FVC ratio changes with ageing, and it is therefore inappropriate to use the same ratio at 40 and 90 years, leaving aside gender differences; (3) even when specific diagnoses are excluded, fixed airflow obstruction may be the end-stage of many different underlying processes. The authors believe that they have strong arguments that a COPD diagnosis based solely on spirometric values is nonsense. More sophisticated lung function tests, such as plethysmography, forced oscillation and lung clearance index, may help further to delineate the characteristics of low lung function. However, these are not feasible in most clinical contexts and in epidemiologic studies. Therefore, the authors throw down the gauntlet: spirometry is an essential tool in patient evaluation but dangerous for disease diagnosis, and the term COPD should only be used in the appropriate clinical (diagnostic) context.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 25 August 2011
Published date: January 2012
Organisations: Human Development & Health

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 196217
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/196217
ISSN: 0040-6376
PURE UUID: eed7d83b-3c80-4a54-a9d0-deeca5135d2f
ORCID for J.W. Holloway: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9998-0464

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Sep 2011 11:00
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: D.S. Postma
Author: G. Brusselle
Author: A. Bush
Author: J.W. Holloway ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×