The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Epistemic deontology and voluntariness

Record type: Article

We tend to prescribe and appraise doxastic states in terms that are broadly deontic. According to a simple argument, such prescriptions and appraisals are improper, because they wrongly presuppose that our doxastic states are voluntary. One strategy for resisting this argument, recently endorsed by a number of philosophers, is to claim that our doxastic states are in fact voluntary (This strategy has been pursued by Steup 2008; Weatherson 2008). In this paper I argue that this strategy is neither successful nor necessary. Our doxastic states are not voluntary in any interesting sense. But once we see why our doxastic states are not voluntary, we can also see that there is no apparent reason to think that deontic prescriptions and appraisals—epistemic ones, at any rate—presuppose doxastic voluntarism. Indeed, there is good reason to deny that they do so. Finally, I diagnose the misleading attraction of the idea that what I call ‘epistemic deontology’ presupposes doxastic voluntarism.

Full text not available from this repository.

Citation

McHugh, Conor (2012) Epistemic deontology and voluntariness Erkenntnis, 77, pp. 65-94. (doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9299-6).

More information

Published date: 2012
Organisations: Philosophy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 196339
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/196339
ISSN: 0165-0106
PURE UUID: ba32b679-b10e-4d08-acb1-8f3137bd6b5d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Sep 2011 12:27
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 11:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Conor McHugh

University divisions


Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×