How to do things with security post 9/11
How to do things with security post 9/11
Discourses and the ideas, perceptions and templates upon which they are based exert a powerful influence on law-making, push policy-making in a precise direction and determine operational action and outcomes. British counterterrorist law and policy post 9/11 is heavily mediated through a conceptual filter that evokes a siege mode of democracy, which deliberately displaces the traditional rights-based model, and a security narrative based on a double asymmetry. By blending a discursive theoretical approach with an institutionalist perspective, the discussion examines the siege mode of democracy and its implications and the double asymmetry underpinning the Government's framing of the threat and of the means to counter it. Both features of the Government's security discourse are critical in explaining not only British counter-terrorist legislation and policy evolution in the 21st century and the controversial operation ‘Kratos’ adopted by ACPO in 2002, but also their official depiction as necessary, and singular, responses to some structured necessity and the associated logic of ‘no alternative’.
317-342
Kostakopoulou, Dora
98dbedbe-574f-4431-8844-b635d2884788
2008
Kostakopoulou, Dora
98dbedbe-574f-4431-8844-b635d2884788
Kostakopoulou, Dora
(2008)
How to do things with security post 9/11.
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 28 (2), Summer Issue, .
(doi:10.1093/ojls/gqn010).
Abstract
Discourses and the ideas, perceptions and templates upon which they are based exert a powerful influence on law-making, push policy-making in a precise direction and determine operational action and outcomes. British counterterrorist law and policy post 9/11 is heavily mediated through a conceptual filter that evokes a siege mode of democracy, which deliberately displaces the traditional rights-based model, and a security narrative based on a double asymmetry. By blending a discursive theoretical approach with an institutionalist perspective, the discussion examines the siege mode of democracy and its implications and the double asymmetry underpinning the Government's framing of the threat and of the means to counter it. Both features of the Government's security discourse are critical in explaining not only British counter-terrorist legislation and policy evolution in the 21st century and the controversial operation ‘Kratos’ adopted by ACPO in 2002, but also their official depiction as necessary, and singular, responses to some structured necessity and the associated logic of ‘no alternative’.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2008
Organisations:
Southampton Law School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 200417
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/200417
ISSN: 0143-6503
PURE UUID: 125f34b6-73c5-493c-b0d5-203cf0194db3
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Oct 2011 14:26
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 04:19
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Dora Kostakopoulou
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics