Reactions of ‘pincer’ pyridine dicarbene complexes of Fe(0) with silanes
Reactions of ‘pincer’ pyridine dicarbene complexes of Fe(0) with silanes
Reactions of Fe(C-N-C)(N2)2, 1a, or Fe(C-NMe-C)(N2)2, 1b, C-N-C = 2,6-bis(arylimidazol-2-ylidene)pyridine, C-NMe-C = 2,6-bis(arylimidazol-2-ylidene)-3,5-dimethylpyridine, aryl = 2,6-iPr2C6H3, with silanes are described. Complex 1a with excess SiPhH3 and complex 1b with excess Si(tol)H3, Ph = phenyl, C6H5, tol = 2-methylphenyl, gave the complexes [Fe(C-N-C)(SiH2Ph)2(?2-H-SiH2Ph)], 2a, and [Fe(C-NMe-C)(SiH2tol)2(?2-H-SiH2tol)], 2b, respectively. Complex 1b with excess SiPhH3 gave [Fe(C-NMe-C)(SiH2Ph)2(H)2], 3, which was formulated as a dihydride based on the relaxation time T1(min) in the 1H-NMR spectra. Reaction of 1a with SiPh2H2 gave complex [Fe(C-N-C)(SiHPh2)2(?2-H2)], 4, while reaction with Si(mes)H3 gave complex [Fe(C-N-C)(SiH2mes)2(N2)], 5, mes = mesityl, 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl. The comparison of the reactivity with other ‘pincer’ complexes of iron and the mechanism leading to 2a–5 are discussed.
7189-7195
Pugh, David
33c2663d-b70d-4366-8f0a-8765713b25ad
Wells, Neil J.
86312185-007b-495b-86da-4e2e5b9b8025
Evans, David J.
5d6e0d3a-4d43-4214-839e-b2d24b6f3b97
Danopoulos, Andreas A.
4919c13e-ebe4-4456-b329-c806c8e22236
2009
Pugh, David
33c2663d-b70d-4366-8f0a-8765713b25ad
Wells, Neil J.
86312185-007b-495b-86da-4e2e5b9b8025
Evans, David J.
5d6e0d3a-4d43-4214-839e-b2d24b6f3b97
Danopoulos, Andreas A.
4919c13e-ebe4-4456-b329-c806c8e22236
Pugh, David, Wells, Neil J., Evans, David J. and Danopoulos, Andreas A.
(2009)
Reactions of ‘pincer’ pyridine dicarbene complexes of Fe(0) with silanes.
Dalton Transactions, (35), .
(doi:10.1039/b907141p).
Abstract
Reactions of Fe(C-N-C)(N2)2, 1a, or Fe(C-NMe-C)(N2)2, 1b, C-N-C = 2,6-bis(arylimidazol-2-ylidene)pyridine, C-NMe-C = 2,6-bis(arylimidazol-2-ylidene)-3,5-dimethylpyridine, aryl = 2,6-iPr2C6H3, with silanes are described. Complex 1a with excess SiPhH3 and complex 1b with excess Si(tol)H3, Ph = phenyl, C6H5, tol = 2-methylphenyl, gave the complexes [Fe(C-N-C)(SiH2Ph)2(?2-H-SiH2Ph)], 2a, and [Fe(C-NMe-C)(SiH2tol)2(?2-H-SiH2tol)], 2b, respectively. Complex 1b with excess SiPhH3 gave [Fe(C-NMe-C)(SiH2Ph)2(H)2], 3, which was formulated as a dihydride based on the relaxation time T1(min) in the 1H-NMR spectra. Reaction of 1a with SiPh2H2 gave complex [Fe(C-N-C)(SiHPh2)2(?2-H2)], 4, while reaction with Si(mes)H3 gave complex [Fe(C-N-C)(SiH2mes)2(N2)], 5, mes = mesityl, 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl. The comparison of the reactivity with other ‘pincer’ complexes of iron and the mechanism leading to 2a–5 are discussed.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 July 2009
Published date: 2009
Organisations:
Chemistry
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 200441
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/200441
ISSN: 0300-9246
PURE UUID: e23dfc97-e07e-4f37-9cb7-01d0e3bf60a9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Oct 2011 11:26
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:58
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
David Pugh
Author:
David J. Evans
Author:
Andreas A. Danopoulos
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics