Rediscovering the 3 R's: resonance, recursion and resemblance
Rediscovering the 3 R's: resonance, recursion and resemblance
As a product of the Enlightenment, causality is an archetypically modernist concept: causal explanations reflect a perceived need to rationally re-connect, and re-integrate within an explanatory schema, otherwise apparently disparate ‘fragments’ of reality. Modern legal theory, in the analysis of events, circumstances and relationships within social situations, adopts almost uncritically, and deploys widely as an explanatory tool, this model of causality, attempting to link deterministically observed phenomena with underlying tendencies and generative mechanisms. However, while such understandings may help to reinforce notions of reality as objective, stable, orderly and predictable, ‘tightly coupled’ causal explanations sit uneasy alongside postmodern understandings of the world as consisting of creative processes. This paper argues the need for a more radical reconceptualising of the role of causation within law and legal theory, suggesting that postmodern ideas of ‘resonance’, ‘recursion’ and ‘resemblance’ offer a better approach for more accurately reflecting the nature of social phenomena and how they are coupled together to create semblances of regularity
MacLean, James
7ecb7975-746f-4806-9c4f-43efe3527980
1 June 2008
MacLean, James
7ecb7975-746f-4806-9c4f-43efe3527980
MacLean, James
(2008)
Rediscovering the 3 R's: resonance, recursion and resemblance.
Causation in Law and Philosophy, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
10 pp
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
As a product of the Enlightenment, causality is an archetypically modernist concept: causal explanations reflect a perceived need to rationally re-connect, and re-integrate within an explanatory schema, otherwise apparently disparate ‘fragments’ of reality. Modern legal theory, in the analysis of events, circumstances and relationships within social situations, adopts almost uncritically, and deploys widely as an explanatory tool, this model of causality, attempting to link deterministically observed phenomena with underlying tendencies and generative mechanisms. However, while such understandings may help to reinforce notions of reality as objective, stable, orderly and predictable, ‘tightly coupled’ causal explanations sit uneasy alongside postmodern understandings of the world as consisting of creative processes. This paper argues the need for a more radical reconceptualising of the role of causation within law and legal theory, suggesting that postmodern ideas of ‘resonance’, ‘recursion’ and ‘resemblance’ offer a better approach for more accurately reflecting the nature of social phenomena and how they are coupled together to create semblances of regularity
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 June 2008
Venue - Dates:
Causation in Law and Philosophy, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 2008-05-31
Organisations:
Southampton Law School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 200777
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/200777
PURE UUID: d9bd419a-57a0-47d9-89d5-b9ca9008f4a1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Oct 2011 12:24
Last modified: 10 Dec 2021 19:47
Export record
Contributors
Author:
James MacLean
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics