Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit
Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit
Background: normalization Process Theory (NPT) can be used to explain implementation processes in health care relating to new technologies and complex interventions. This paper describes the processes by which we developed a simplified version of NPT for use by clinicians, managers, and policy makers, and which could be embedded in a web-enabled toolkit and on-line users manual.
Methods: between 2006 and 2010 we undertook four tasks. (i) We presented NPT to potential and actual users in multiple workshops, seminars, and presentations. (ii) Using what we discovered from these meetings, we decided to create a simplified set of statements and explanations expressing core constructs of the theory (iii) We circulated these statements to a criterion sample of 60 researchers, clinicians and others, using SurveyMonkey to collect qualitative textual data about their criticisms of the statements. (iv) We then reconstructed the statements and explanations to meet users' criticisms, embedded them in a web-enabled toolkit, and beta tested this 'in the wild'.
Results: on-line data collection was effective: over a four week period 50/60 participants responded using SurveyMonkey (40/60) or direct phone and email contact (10/60). An additional nine responses were received from people who had been sent the SurveyMonkey form by other respondents. Beta testing of the web enabled toolkit produced 13 responses, from 327 visits to www.normalizationprocess.org. Qualitative analysis of both sets of responses showed a high level of support for the statements but also showed that some statements poorly expressed their underlying constructs or overlapped with others. These were rewritten to take account of users' criticisms and then embedded in a web-enabled toolkit. As a result we were able to translate the core constructs into a simplified set of statements that could be utilized by non-experts.
Conclusion: normalization Process Theory has been developed through transparent procedures at each stage of its life. The theory has been shown to be sufficiently robust to merit formal testing. This project has provided a user friendly version of NPT that can be embedded in a web-enabled toolkit and used as a heuristic device to think through implementation and integration problems
245-[45pp]
May, Carl R.
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Finch, Tracy
b1916307-8516-4b70-8ba5-05d3310839de
Ballini, Luciana
466291d7-5c0f-4378-bf66-1039ddf43209
MacFarlane, Anne
8d892346-192c-4c83-96d3-d9e7fba43d64
Mair, Frances
5a57846b-cda7-4368-9d20-0aa2a1d490ca
Murray, Elizabeth
cb300780-9041-44af-9ae5-e13531eb23b8
Treweek, Shaun
2e309a54-c618-4a59-b0fd-2b878034cb98
Rapley, Tim
eb4364d5-c016-403a-969a-aae1fd35a97c
September 2011
May, Carl R.
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Finch, Tracy
b1916307-8516-4b70-8ba5-05d3310839de
Ballini, Luciana
466291d7-5c0f-4378-bf66-1039ddf43209
MacFarlane, Anne
8d892346-192c-4c83-96d3-d9e7fba43d64
Mair, Frances
5a57846b-cda7-4368-9d20-0aa2a1d490ca
Murray, Elizabeth
cb300780-9041-44af-9ae5-e13531eb23b8
Treweek, Shaun
2e309a54-c618-4a59-b0fd-2b878034cb98
Rapley, Tim
eb4364d5-c016-403a-969a-aae1fd35a97c
May, Carl R., Finch, Tracy, Ballini, Luciana, MacFarlane, Anne, Mair, Frances, Murray, Elizabeth, Treweek, Shaun and Rapley, Tim
(2011)
Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit.
BMC Health Services Research, 11 (1), .
(doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-245).
Abstract
Background: normalization Process Theory (NPT) can be used to explain implementation processes in health care relating to new technologies and complex interventions. This paper describes the processes by which we developed a simplified version of NPT for use by clinicians, managers, and policy makers, and which could be embedded in a web-enabled toolkit and on-line users manual.
Methods: between 2006 and 2010 we undertook four tasks. (i) We presented NPT to potential and actual users in multiple workshops, seminars, and presentations. (ii) Using what we discovered from these meetings, we decided to create a simplified set of statements and explanations expressing core constructs of the theory (iii) We circulated these statements to a criterion sample of 60 researchers, clinicians and others, using SurveyMonkey to collect qualitative textual data about their criticisms of the statements. (iv) We then reconstructed the statements and explanations to meet users' criticisms, embedded them in a web-enabled toolkit, and beta tested this 'in the wild'.
Results: on-line data collection was effective: over a four week period 50/60 participants responded using SurveyMonkey (40/60) or direct phone and email contact (10/60). An additional nine responses were received from people who had been sent the SurveyMonkey form by other respondents. Beta testing of the web enabled toolkit produced 13 responses, from 327 visits to www.normalizationprocess.org. Qualitative analysis of both sets of responses showed a high level of support for the statements but also showed that some statements poorly expressed their underlying constructs or overlapped with others. These were rewritten to take account of users' criticisms and then embedded in a web-enabled toolkit. As a result we were able to translate the core constructs into a simplified set of statements that could be utilized by non-experts.
Conclusion: normalization Process Theory has been developed through transparent procedures at each stage of its life. The theory has been shown to be sufficiently robust to merit formal testing. This project has provided a user friendly version of NPT that can be embedded in a web-enabled toolkit and used as a heuristic device to think through implementation and integration problems
Text
1472-6963-11-245.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: September 2011
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 200965
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/200965
ISSN: 1472-6963
PURE UUID: 47767e3f-5f91-4e1e-82a4-c785c0971c58
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Oct 2011 09:04
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 04:20
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Carl R. May
Author:
Tracy Finch
Author:
Luciana Ballini
Author:
Anne MacFarlane
Author:
Frances Mair
Author:
Elizabeth Murray
Author:
Shaun Treweek
Author:
Tim Rapley
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics