The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Impact of cancer on everyday life: a systematic appraisal of the research evidence

Impact of cancer on everyday life: a systematic appraisal of the research evidence
Impact of cancer on everyday life: a systematic appraisal of the research evidence
Objective: to conduct a systematic appraisal of the published literature reviews related to the impact of cancer on everyday life. This theme was identified as the top priority area for research by participants in the Macmillan Listening Study, which was the first UK-wide public consultation exercise to identify patients’ priorities for cancer research.

Search strategy: the top priority area was divided into ten sub-themes, and a modified systematic review was undertaken for each sub-theme using electronic searches.

Inclusion criteria: literature review papers were included if they were written in English, involved patients diagnosed ?18 years, any cancer types and published between 2000 and 2006.

Data extraction and synthesis: two thousand and two hundred and fifty-two potentially eligible papers were identified. Abstracts were read by the first author and selected for inclusion in the review. Twenty percentages of the papers were also read independently by other authors. Sixty-two review papers were finally selected.

Main results: the systematic appraisal revealed that some sub-themes of the patient-identified priority area (e.g., how to support family members of cancer patients) were under-researched, while other sub-themes (e.g., anxiety and depression experienced by cancer patients) had been explored to some extent. Certain areas of research interest to patients were found to have been explored; however, their significance was limited by the quality of the research.

Conclusion: the systematic appraisal highlights important areas for future research and the need for more effective dissemination of study findings to wider audiences, including service users. This study also indicates the need for further research to enhance the generalizability and/or significance of findings
1369-6513
Okamoto, Ikumi
fc9b4fed-0c78-4925-9e6f-2bfa7c3d48bc
Wright, David
a55be721-4b15-4555-bf61-73fcb75c1a39
Foster, Claire
00786ac1-bd47-4aeb-a0e2-40e058695b73
Okamoto, Ikumi
fc9b4fed-0c78-4925-9e6f-2bfa7c3d48bc
Wright, David
a55be721-4b15-4555-bf61-73fcb75c1a39
Foster, Claire
00786ac1-bd47-4aeb-a0e2-40e058695b73

Okamoto, Ikumi, Wright, David and Foster, Claire (2011) Impact of cancer on everyday life: a systematic appraisal of the research evidence. Health Expectations. (doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00662.x). (PMID:21332618)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: to conduct a systematic appraisal of the published literature reviews related to the impact of cancer on everyday life. This theme was identified as the top priority area for research by participants in the Macmillan Listening Study, which was the first UK-wide public consultation exercise to identify patients’ priorities for cancer research.

Search strategy: the top priority area was divided into ten sub-themes, and a modified systematic review was undertaken for each sub-theme using electronic searches.

Inclusion criteria: literature review papers were included if they were written in English, involved patients diagnosed ?18 years, any cancer types and published between 2000 and 2006.

Data extraction and synthesis: two thousand and two hundred and fifty-two potentially eligible papers were identified. Abstracts were read by the first author and selected for inclusion in the review. Twenty percentages of the papers were also read independently by other authors. Sixty-two review papers were finally selected.

Main results: the systematic appraisal revealed that some sub-themes of the patient-identified priority area (e.g., how to support family members of cancer patients) were under-researched, while other sub-themes (e.g., anxiety and depression experienced by cancer patients) had been explored to some extent. Certain areas of research interest to patients were found to have been explored; however, their significance was limited by the quality of the research.

Conclusion: the systematic appraisal highlights important areas for future research and the need for more effective dissemination of study findings to wider audiences, including service users. This study also indicates the need for further research to enhance the generalizability and/or significance of findings

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: February 2011
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 200991
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/200991
ISSN: 1369-6513
PURE UUID: 162cbf28-2d1c-4810-8580-333f177b6018
ORCID for Claire Foster: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4703-8378

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Oct 2011 12:38
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ikumi Okamoto
Author: David Wright
Author: Claire Foster ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×