Benefits and challenges of collaborative research: lessons from supportive and palliative care
Benefits and challenges of collaborative research: lessons from supportive and palliative care
Objective: to describe the processes of establishing and running the Cancer Experiences Collaborative (CECo), and reflect upon the benefits and challenges of undertaking collaborative research in supportive and palliative care.
Design: a descriptive analysis of a 5-year research collaborative initiated in 2006.
Setting: research groups at the Universities of Lancaster, Liverpool, Manchester, Nottingham and Southampton, England.
Participants: 26 UK organisations including the four largest hospices in England, hospital cancer centres, Help the Hospices (a national charity supporting independent hospices) and user representatives.
Findings: the aim of CECo was to enhance the value, quality and productivity of scientific research in supportive and palliative care, and to increase research capacity and improve the coordination of collaborative research. Three programmatic themes of research were established: (i) innovative approaches to complex symptoms, (ii) planning for the care of older adults towards the end of life and (iii) research methodology including narrative approaches. Four benefits and challenges are highlighted: strategic leadership and management structures for cross-institutional work, working in multidisciplinary groups and linking research with practice settings, capacity building, and user involvement.
Conclusions: the activities of CECo have resulted in significant benefits with an increase in good quality research studies that have led to the production of a significant number of peer-reviewed papers, and learning between academics, clinicians and users, which has contributed to raising the standards of supportive and palliative care research. However, the future of such research initiatives is fragile, with concerns about the sustainability of collaboration in the face of diminishing resources
5-11
Payne, Sheila
d7c97f41-ec69-4157-9339-ca07c521fbcc
Seymour, Jane
b001b1f3-1ac4-495d-837f-10ca5154b5af
Molassiotis, Alex
f4f18817-07cb-48ca-a51e-9504aa886a79
Froggatt, Katherine
ee054351-b917-4f12-a103-8c0aa5810815
Grande, Gunn
7335911a-ee7f-44cd-924e-c8b3c903fe6c
Lloyd-Williams, Mari
80771f88-6f66-4130-a93c-cf5746db30d9
Foster, Claire
00786ac1-bd47-4aeb-a0e2-40e058695b73
Wilson, Roger
b41ee42d-345c-4c56-8707-54269107957e
Rolls, Liz
da7de83d-33c4-4cfc-a162-0912e5b1280d
Todd, Chris
33002864-c97b-434b-8b3f-95431310b2d7
Addington-Hall, Julia
87560cc4-7562-4f9b-b908-81f3b603fdd8
2011
Payne, Sheila
d7c97f41-ec69-4157-9339-ca07c521fbcc
Seymour, Jane
b001b1f3-1ac4-495d-837f-10ca5154b5af
Molassiotis, Alex
f4f18817-07cb-48ca-a51e-9504aa886a79
Froggatt, Katherine
ee054351-b917-4f12-a103-8c0aa5810815
Grande, Gunn
7335911a-ee7f-44cd-924e-c8b3c903fe6c
Lloyd-Williams, Mari
80771f88-6f66-4130-a93c-cf5746db30d9
Foster, Claire
00786ac1-bd47-4aeb-a0e2-40e058695b73
Wilson, Roger
b41ee42d-345c-4c56-8707-54269107957e
Rolls, Liz
da7de83d-33c4-4cfc-a162-0912e5b1280d
Todd, Chris
33002864-c97b-434b-8b3f-95431310b2d7
Addington-Hall, Julia
87560cc4-7562-4f9b-b908-81f3b603fdd8
Payne, Sheila, Seymour, Jane, Molassiotis, Alex, Froggatt, Katherine, Grande, Gunn, Lloyd-Williams, Mari, Foster, Claire, Wilson, Roger, Rolls, Liz, Todd, Chris and Addington-Hall, Julia
(2011)
Benefits and challenges of collaborative research: lessons from supportive and palliative care.
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 1, .
(doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000018).
Abstract
Objective: to describe the processes of establishing and running the Cancer Experiences Collaborative (CECo), and reflect upon the benefits and challenges of undertaking collaborative research in supportive and palliative care.
Design: a descriptive analysis of a 5-year research collaborative initiated in 2006.
Setting: research groups at the Universities of Lancaster, Liverpool, Manchester, Nottingham and Southampton, England.
Participants: 26 UK organisations including the four largest hospices in England, hospital cancer centres, Help the Hospices (a national charity supporting independent hospices) and user representatives.
Findings: the aim of CECo was to enhance the value, quality and productivity of scientific research in supportive and palliative care, and to increase research capacity and improve the coordination of collaborative research. Three programmatic themes of research were established: (i) innovative approaches to complex symptoms, (ii) planning for the care of older adults towards the end of life and (iii) research methodology including narrative approaches. Four benefits and challenges are highlighted: strategic leadership and management structures for cross-institutional work, working in multidisciplinary groups and linking research with practice settings, capacity building, and user involvement.
Conclusions: the activities of CECo have resulted in significant benefits with an increase in good quality research studies that have led to the production of a significant number of peer-reviewed papers, and learning between academics, clinicians and users, which has contributed to raising the standards of supportive and palliative care research. However, the future of such research initiatives is fragile, with concerns about the sustainability of collaboration in the face of diminishing resources
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2011
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 200993
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/200993
ISSN: 2045-435X
PURE UUID: 632fab3a-8df7-416b-bcbc-cd819926c76f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Oct 2011 11:23
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:21
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Sheila Payne
Author:
Jane Seymour
Author:
Alex Molassiotis
Author:
Katherine Froggatt
Author:
Gunn Grande
Author:
Mari Lloyd-Williams
Author:
Roger Wilson
Author:
Liz Rolls
Author:
Chris Todd
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics