European citizenship and immigration after Amsterdam: Openings, silences, paradoxes
European citizenship and immigration after Amsterdam: Openings, silences, paradoxes
European Union citizenship, as a form of citizenship beyond the nation state, entails the promise of the formation of a heterogeneous and democratic European public, empowering citizens and ethnic residents. Notwithstanding this promise, the 1996 intergovernmental conference that culminated in the Treaty of Amsterdam (signed on 2 October 1997) did not extend the personal scope of Union citizenship to include long-term resident third country nationals. Other substantive reforms, however, such as the inclusion of an anti-discrimination clause, the institutionalisation of the right to information, the strengthening of democratic accountability and the enhanced respect for human rights, all improve the rights of citizens, and ethnic migrant residents and members of other disadvantaged groups generally. The partial communitarisation of the third pillar has furnished the basis for a Community immigration and asylum policy that is subject to increasing democratic and judicial control. However, it has also opened the way for the installation of exclusionary categories and the ‘security’ narrative on immigration control, which has largely characterised the third pillar within the system of Community law.
639-656
Kostakopoulou, Theodora
7e15e7c8-a1a4-42d9-b5ec-4a135a538ba3
1998
Kostakopoulou, Theodora
7e15e7c8-a1a4-42d9-b5ec-4a135a538ba3
Kostakopoulou, Theodora
(1998)
European citizenship and immigration after Amsterdam: Openings, silences, paradoxes.
[in special issue: The European Union: Immigration, Asylum and Citizenship]
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24 (4), .
(doi:10.1080/1369183X.1998.9976658).
Abstract
European Union citizenship, as a form of citizenship beyond the nation state, entails the promise of the formation of a heterogeneous and democratic European public, empowering citizens and ethnic residents. Notwithstanding this promise, the 1996 intergovernmental conference that culminated in the Treaty of Amsterdam (signed on 2 October 1997) did not extend the personal scope of Union citizenship to include long-term resident third country nationals. Other substantive reforms, however, such as the inclusion of an anti-discrimination clause, the institutionalisation of the right to information, the strengthening of democratic accountability and the enhanced respect for human rights, all improve the rights of citizens, and ethnic migrant residents and members of other disadvantaged groups generally. The partial communitarisation of the third pillar has furnished the basis for a Community immigration and asylum policy that is subject to increasing democratic and judicial control. However, it has also opened the way for the installation of exclusionary categories and the ‘security’ narrative on immigration control, which has largely characterised the third pillar within the system of Community law.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1998
Organisations:
Southampton Law School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 202817
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/202817
ISSN: 1369-183X
PURE UUID: 767cb563-437e-45c3-bae0-5a6af3c1df54
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Nov 2011 12:03
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 04:25
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Theodora Kostakopoulou
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
Loading...
View more statistics