The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

EORTC workshop on clinical trial methodology in older individuals with a diagnosis of solid tumors

Pallis, A.G., Ring, A., Fortpied, C., Penninckx, B, Van Nes, M.C., Wedding, U., Vonminckwitz, G., Johnson, C.D., Wyld, L., Timmer-Bonte, A., Bonnetain, F., Repetto, L., Aapro, M., Luciani, A. and Wildiers, H. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Elderly Task Force (2011) EORTC workshop on clinical trial methodology in older individuals with a diagnosis of solid tumors Annals of Oncology, 22, (8), pp. 1922-1926. (doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq687). (PMID:21266517).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: due to the aging of the population, the number of older patients diagnosed with a malignant disease is increasing. A multidisciplinary approach to the senior adult cancer patient is mandatory, to assure optimal diagnosis and therapeutic management.

Design: european Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has currently defined senior adult oncology as one of its priorities and has established an active Elderly Task Force (ETF). Under the auspices of the EORTC, the ETF organized a workshop on clinical trial methodology in older cancer patients and in this article, we present the conclusions of this workshop.

Results: besides the ‘classical’ efficacy end points, quality of life, functional status and independence of the patient should be assessed in clinical trials in older patients. The participants of the workshop agreed on the use of a minimum dataset for the assessment of global health and functional status in older cancer patients. The panel also recommended that optimization of collaboration with pharmaceutical industry requires reporting of age-related data (subgroup analyses of clinical trials, age-related pooled analyses and obligatory post-marketing studies in vulnerable and frail older patients).

Conclusion: the identification of proper clinical outcomes and the validation of geriatric screening tools are needed for conducting sound and comparable clinical trials

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: August 2011
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 202969
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/202969
ISSN: 1569-8041
PURE UUID: caa233c6-f8ab-4d45-a58d-5978341dddf2

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Nov 2011 12:22
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 11:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A.G. Pallis
Author: A. Ring
Author: C. Fortpied
Author: B Penninckx
Author: M.C. Van Nes
Author: U. Wedding
Author: G. Vonminckwitz
Author: C.D. Johnson
Author: L. Wyld
Author: A. Timmer-Bonte
Author: F. Bonnetain
Author: L. Repetto
Author: M. Aapro
Author: A. Luciani
Author: H. Wildiers

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×