'O what a tangled web we weave' - towards a practice that does not deceive
'O what a tangled web we weave' - towards a practice that does not deceive
The rapidly increasing number of projects that utilize network analysis would on the face of it suggest that a methodological revolution was taking place in Archaeology and Classical Studies. Yet the term belies an extremely wide array of techniques, many with different theoretical underpinnings, and there has as yet been little in the way of consolidation or even categorization of such approaches. This paper will critically reflect on the methodologies adopted by three research projects that have used networks in different ways to understand the ancient world: Calculating centrality metrics in a transport landscape, synthesizing heterogeneous excavation data and surfacing hidden internal structures within ancient cartography. The comparison will not only demonstrate that network thinking can be applied to a wide range of fields, but also highlight some of the challenges involved. Foremost among these are the social and semantic difficulties of introducing novel abstractions into the mainstream of a discipline. How can their meaning – and the processes that produce it – be rendered transparent to other researchers?
And just as importantly, how can the undeniably seductive nature of their visual impact be prevented from suggesting conclusions they do not support?
978-0-19-969709-0
43-67
Isaksen, Leif
ecb71d6b-bea8-423c-8685-33d4c2658467
25 April 2013
Isaksen, Leif
ecb71d6b-bea8-423c-8685-33d4c2658467
Isaksen, Leif
(2013)
'O what a tangled web we weave' - towards a practice that does not deceive.
In,
Knappett, Carl
(ed.)
Network Analysis in Archaeology: New Approaches to Regional Interaction.
Oxford, GB.
Oxford University Press, .
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
The rapidly increasing number of projects that utilize network analysis would on the face of it suggest that a methodological revolution was taking place in Archaeology and Classical Studies. Yet the term belies an extremely wide array of techniques, many with different theoretical underpinnings, and there has as yet been little in the way of consolidation or even categorization of such approaches. This paper will critically reflect on the methodologies adopted by three research projects that have used networks in different ways to understand the ancient world: Calculating centrality metrics in a transport landscape, synthesizing heterogeneous excavation data and surfacing hidden internal structures within ancient cartography. The comparison will not only demonstrate that network thinking can be applied to a wide range of fields, but also highlight some of the challenges involved. Foremost among these are the social and semantic difficulties of introducing novel abstractions into the mainstream of a discipline. How can their meaning – and the processes that produce it – be rendered transparent to other researchers?
And just as importantly, how can the undeniably seductive nature of their visual impact be prevented from suggesting conclusions they do not support?
Text
__soton.ac.uk_ude_PersonalFiles_Users_slb1_mydocuments_New folder_Knappett_Ch-03-Isaksen-w-TOC.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: 25 April 2013
Organisations:
Archaeology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 204475
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/204475
ISBN: 978-0-19-969709-0
PURE UUID: 83a6e23d-2a70-40cf-9efc-3928c24c5113
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Nov 2011 14:36
Last modified: 12 Sep 2024 17:09
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Leif Isaksen
Editor:
Carl Knappett
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics