The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A branch-and-cut algorithm for quadratic assignment problems based on linearizations

A branch-and-cut algorithm for quadratic assignment problems based on linearizations
A branch-and-cut algorithm for quadratic assignment problems based on linearizations
The quadratic assignment problem (QAP) is one of the hardest combinatorial optimization problems known. Exact solution attempts proposed for instances of size larger than 15 have been generally unsuccessful even though successful implementations have been reported on some test problems from the QAPLIB up to size 36. In this study, we focus on the Koopmans–Beckmann formulation and exploit the structure of the flow and distance matrices based on a flow-based linearization technique that we propose. We present two new IP formulations based on the flow-based linearization technique that require fewer variables and yield stronger lower bounds than existing formulations. We strengthen the formulations with valid inequalities and report computational experience with a branch-and-cut algorithm. The proposed method performs quite well on QAPLIB instances for which certain metrics (indices) that we proposed that are related to the degree of difficulty of solving the problem are relatively high (?0.3). Many of the well-known instances up to size 25 from the QAPLIB (e.g. nug24, chr25a) are in this class and solved in a matter of days on a single PC using the proposed algorithm
0305-0548
1085-1106
Erdogan, Gunes
468310a1-5c36-4c3d-8b39-079bd621b34b
Tansel, Barbaros
3933683b-8a6f-4623-9b67-35ba9915ba03
Erdogan, Gunes
468310a1-5c36-4c3d-8b39-079bd621b34b
Tansel, Barbaros
3933683b-8a6f-4623-9b67-35ba9915ba03

Erdogan, Gunes and Tansel, Barbaros (2007) A branch-and-cut algorithm for quadratic assignment problems based on linearizations. Computers & Operations Research, 34 (4), 1085-1106. (doi:10.1016/j.cor.2005.05.027).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The quadratic assignment problem (QAP) is one of the hardest combinatorial optimization problems known. Exact solution attempts proposed for instances of size larger than 15 have been generally unsuccessful even though successful implementations have been reported on some test problems from the QAPLIB up to size 36. In this study, we focus on the Koopmans–Beckmann formulation and exploit the structure of the flow and distance matrices based on a flow-based linearization technique that we propose. We present two new IP formulations based on the flow-based linearization technique that require fewer variables and yield stronger lower bounds than existing formulations. We strengthen the formulations with valid inequalities and report computational experience with a branch-and-cut algorithm. The proposed method performs quite well on QAPLIB instances for which certain metrics (indices) that we proposed that are related to the degree of difficulty of solving the problem are relatively high (?0.3). Many of the well-known instances up to size 25 from the QAPLIB (e.g. nug24, chr25a) are in this class and solved in a matter of days on a single PC using the proposed algorithm

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: April 2007
Organisations: Centre of Excellence for International Banking, Finance & Accounting

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 204809
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/204809
ISSN: 0305-0548
PURE UUID: 48f0451d-50dd-4629-b50e-a41000c0e427

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Dec 2011 15:10
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 04:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gunes Erdogan
Author: Barbaros Tansel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×