Performance management in Universities: an 'old' institutional economics perspective, culture and consequences
Performance management in Universities: an 'old' institutional economics perspective, culture and consequences
This paper reports on a research project that builds on previous work by Broad, Goddard & Von
Alberti (2007) and Broad & Goddard (2010). The focus of this paper is to consider an ‘old’ institutional
economics perspective in the evolution of performance management systems within the university
sector. The research will compare the findings of the UK sector with research undertaken in
Singapore to develop an international comparative context.
An Old Institutional Economics (OIE) perspective was linked with accounting research during the
1990’s (see Ahmed & Scapens, 2000) although its origins date back the turn of the 20th Century
(Veblen, 1919). The OIE approach views the institution as an economic entity and seeks to
understand the processes by which it operates and “provides a potentially useful basis for
understanding the institutionalised character of organisational routines and rule-based behaviours,
such as accounting” (Ahmed & Scapens, 2000 p.167)
Broad & Goddard (2010) argue that there is a particular managerial weltanshauung within the higher
educational institutions they studied that embed the rules, routines, habits, and potentially the culture,
of performance management. Such a weltanshauung, it is suggested, links with the OIE view that
institutions are defined as “a way of thought or action of some prevalence or permanence, which is
embedded in the habits of a group or the customs of a people” (Hamilton, 1932 p.84).
The focus on the notion of rules, routines and habits within the institution provides a unique lens by
which to view an organisation to help understand the barriers/ enablers of how such a performance
system is developed. Sorlin (2007) contends that such performance systems might not be developing
in the most efficient manner due to pressure of funding donors and research has been called for in
this area by Bignall & Modell (2000, p.301) to further understand the “core concepts of integration and
balance in performance management design”.
This paper will therefore review the principles of Old Institutional Economics and its application to the
accounting literature, particularly focussing on performance management within the university sector
and further developments of this research project.
Broad, M.J.
81955ffa-a9d3-42cd-99c8-52e06cd67424
5 September 2011
Broad, M.J.
81955ffa-a9d3-42cd-99c8-52e06cd67424
Broad, M.J.
(2011)
Performance management in Universities: an 'old' institutional economics perspective, culture and consequences.
6th Conference on Performance Measurement and Management Control, Nice, France.
06 - 08 Sep 2011.
13 pp
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
This paper reports on a research project that builds on previous work by Broad, Goddard & Von
Alberti (2007) and Broad & Goddard (2010). The focus of this paper is to consider an ‘old’ institutional
economics perspective in the evolution of performance management systems within the university
sector. The research will compare the findings of the UK sector with research undertaken in
Singapore to develop an international comparative context.
An Old Institutional Economics (OIE) perspective was linked with accounting research during the
1990’s (see Ahmed & Scapens, 2000) although its origins date back the turn of the 20th Century
(Veblen, 1919). The OIE approach views the institution as an economic entity and seeks to
understand the processes by which it operates and “provides a potentially useful basis for
understanding the institutionalised character of organisational routines and rule-based behaviours,
such as accounting” (Ahmed & Scapens, 2000 p.167)
Broad & Goddard (2010) argue that there is a particular managerial weltanshauung within the higher
educational institutions they studied that embed the rules, routines, habits, and potentially the culture,
of performance management. Such a weltanshauung, it is suggested, links with the OIE view that
institutions are defined as “a way of thought or action of some prevalence or permanence, which is
embedded in the habits of a group or the customs of a people” (Hamilton, 1932 p.84).
The focus on the notion of rules, routines and habits within the institution provides a unique lens by
which to view an organisation to help understand the barriers/ enablers of how such a performance
system is developed. Sorlin (2007) contends that such performance systems might not be developing
in the most efficient manner due to pressure of funding donors and research has been called for in
this area by Bignall & Modell (2000, p.301) to further understand the “core concepts of integration and
balance in performance management design”.
This paper will therefore review the principles of Old Institutional Economics and its application to the
accounting literature, particularly focussing on performance management within the university sector
and further developments of this research project.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 5 September 2011
Venue - Dates:
6th Conference on Performance Measurement and Management Control, Nice, France, 2011-09-06 - 2011-09-08
Organisations:
Southampton Business School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 204997
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/204997
PURE UUID: 28f667fb-69df-431c-b8bc-b98dc6ae2cd2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Dec 2011 13:36
Last modified: 10 Dec 2021 19:54
Export record
Contributors
Author:
M.J. Broad
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics