The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Effect of appendicularians and copepods on bacterioplankton composition and growth in the English Channel

Effect of appendicularians and copepods on bacterioplankton composition and growth in the English Channel
Effect of appendicularians and copepods on bacterioplankton composition and growth in the English Channel
We compared the effects of the presence of the appendicularian Oikopleura dioica and the copepods Acartia clausii and Calanus helgolandicus on the coastal bacterioplankton community off Plymouth. Mesozooplankton were added to water samples and bacterioplankton growth was monitored by flow cytometry. Phylogenetic composition of bacterioplankton was analysed using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. The bacterioplankton composition did not change in the presence of either appendicularians or copepods, and generally the same proportions of bacterioplankton groups were determined. In late spring, 15 ± 2% of cells hybridised with a probe specific to the Kingdom Archaea. The majority of cells (88 ± 2%) belonged to the Kingdom Bacteria, and 86% of cells were identified using group-specific probes. The Cytophage-Flavobacterium cluster dominated the community, comprising 64 ± 0.5% of cells. The g-proteobacteria were the second abundant group, comprising 11 ± 0.5% of cells, and the SAR86 cluster of g-proteobacteria accounted for 6 ± 5%. The a-proteobacteria comprised 10 ± 5% of bacterioplankton, and the Roseobacteria related cluster represented 9 ± 3% of cells. The reduction of bacterioplankton growth caused by appendicularian bacterivory was 0.4 to 14% ind.-1 l-1, and the total appendicularian population could reduce bacterial growth in coastal waters in late spring-summer by up to 9%. In contrast to the appendicularians the copepods stimulated bacterial growth, and in summer the bacterioplankton growth may be increased by up to 13% by the combined effect of dominant copepod populations. Thus, the appendicularians and copepods had an opposite but moderate effect on the bacterioplankton growth and no effect on the bacterioplankton composition.
Community structure · Zooplankton · FISH · Flow cytometry · Bacterial production · Nutrient bioavailability
0948-3055
39-46
Zubkov, M.V.
b1dfb3a0-bcff-430c-9031-358a22b50743
Lopez-Urrutia, A.
7a3b9dd5-2df8-45de-ae85-f30a19a6d875
Zubkov, M.V.
b1dfb3a0-bcff-430c-9031-358a22b50743
Lopez-Urrutia, A.
7a3b9dd5-2df8-45de-ae85-f30a19a6d875

Zubkov, M.V. and Lopez-Urrutia, A. (2003) Effect of appendicularians and copepods on bacterioplankton composition and growth in the English Channel. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 32 (1), 39-46.

Record type: Article

Abstract

We compared the effects of the presence of the appendicularian Oikopleura dioica and the copepods Acartia clausii and Calanus helgolandicus on the coastal bacterioplankton community off Plymouth. Mesozooplankton were added to water samples and bacterioplankton growth was monitored by flow cytometry. Phylogenetic composition of bacterioplankton was analysed using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. The bacterioplankton composition did not change in the presence of either appendicularians or copepods, and generally the same proportions of bacterioplankton groups were determined. In late spring, 15 ± 2% of cells hybridised with a probe specific to the Kingdom Archaea. The majority of cells (88 ± 2%) belonged to the Kingdom Bacteria, and 86% of cells were identified using group-specific probes. The Cytophage-Flavobacterium cluster dominated the community, comprising 64 ± 0.5% of cells. The g-proteobacteria were the second abundant group, comprising 11 ± 0.5% of cells, and the SAR86 cluster of g-proteobacteria accounted for 6 ± 5%. The a-proteobacteria comprised 10 ± 5% of bacterioplankton, and the Roseobacteria related cluster represented 9 ± 3% of cells. The reduction of bacterioplankton growth caused by appendicularian bacterivory was 0.4 to 14% ind.-1 l-1, and the total appendicularian population could reduce bacterial growth in coastal waters in late spring-summer by up to 9%. In contrast to the appendicularians the copepods stimulated bacterial growth, and in summer the bacterioplankton growth may be increased by up to 13% by the combined effect of dominant copepod populations. Thus, the appendicularians and copepods had an opposite but moderate effect on the bacterioplankton growth and no effect on the bacterioplankton composition.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2003
Keywords: Community structure · Zooplankton · FISH · Flow cytometry · Bacterial production · Nutrient bioavailability

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 2051
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/2051
ISSN: 0948-3055
PURE UUID: 5ef45bda-6635-4780-b281-20c6234d707c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 May 2004
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 00:56

Export record

Contributors

Author: M.V. Zubkov
Author: A. Lopez-Urrutia

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×