The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Accounting for water quality in monitoring access to safe drinking-water as part of the Millennium Development Goals: lessons from five countries

Accounting for water quality in monitoring access to safe drinking-water as part of the Millennium Development Goals: lessons from five countries
Accounting for water quality in monitoring access to safe drinking-water as part of the Millennium Development Goals: lessons from five countries
Objective: To take account of source water quality in estimating access to safe drinking water under Millennium Development Goal (MDG) target 7c and adjust reported progress.

Methods: For five countries, we adjust the Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) methods for reporting baseline and progress towards MDG Target 7c by incorporating the results from nationally representative surveys of the microbial and chemical quality of improved water sources. We cross-checked our application of these methods with JMP.

Findings: Accounting for microbial and chemical compliance with a subset of WHO water quality guidelines as part of the MDG indicator substantially reduces reported access to ‘safe’ water in 2008 for four of the five countries: Ethiopia (11%), Nicaragua (16%), Nigeria (15%), and Tajikistan (7%). In these countries, the mix of improved sources includes substantial numbers of unsafe sources that have poor water quality. Adjusting for microbial compliance has the larger effect.

Conclusion: Although our analysis cannot be extrapolated to global scale, it suggests that the current MDG indicator overestimates levels of access to safe water and that in some countries the over-estimation is substantial. In future monitoring developments, separately capturing the effects of access and water quality would represent a significant improvement.
0042-9686
228-235A
Bain, Robert
c74dff86-c531-4941-9453-77a733634750
Gundry, Stephen
7146591d-c1c8-4160-96a6-26d5ce136ab6
Wright, J.A.
94990ecf-f8dd-4649-84f2-b28bf272e464
Yang, Hong
2ea2c94c-8d28-4555-98f9-59b615b0cee7
Pedley, Steve
4ad4d2f3-3e70-4f82-8b3b-c2d2f2b5df5a
Bartram, Jamie
38ea4df5-7864-46cd-8d01-ad1810cccba6
Bain, Robert
c74dff86-c531-4941-9453-77a733634750
Gundry, Stephen
7146591d-c1c8-4160-96a6-26d5ce136ab6
Wright, J.A.
94990ecf-f8dd-4649-84f2-b28bf272e464
Yang, Hong
2ea2c94c-8d28-4555-98f9-59b615b0cee7
Pedley, Steve
4ad4d2f3-3e70-4f82-8b3b-c2d2f2b5df5a
Bartram, Jamie
38ea4df5-7864-46cd-8d01-ad1810cccba6

Bain, Robert, Gundry, Stephen, Wright, J.A., Yang, Hong, Pedley, Steve and Bartram, Jamie (2012) Accounting for water quality in monitoring access to safe drinking-water as part of the Millennium Development Goals: lessons from five countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90 (3), 228-235A. (doi:10.2471/BLT.11.094284).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: To take account of source water quality in estimating access to safe drinking water under Millennium Development Goal (MDG) target 7c and adjust reported progress.

Methods: For five countries, we adjust the Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) methods for reporting baseline and progress towards MDG Target 7c by incorporating the results from nationally representative surveys of the microbial and chemical quality of improved water sources. We cross-checked our application of these methods with JMP.

Findings: Accounting for microbial and chemical compliance with a subset of WHO water quality guidelines as part of the MDG indicator substantially reduces reported access to ‘safe’ water in 2008 for four of the five countries: Ethiopia (11%), Nicaragua (16%), Nigeria (15%), and Tajikistan (7%). In these countries, the mix of improved sources includes substantial numbers of unsafe sources that have poor water quality. Adjusting for microbial compliance has the larger effect.

Conclusion: Although our analysis cannot be extrapolated to global scale, it suggests that the current MDG indicator overestimates levels of access to safe water and that in some countries the over-estimation is substantial. In future monitoring developments, separately capturing the effects of access and water quality would represent a significant improvement.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 20 January 2012
Published date: March 2012
Organisations: PHEW – P (Population Health), Population, Health & Wellbeing (PHeW)

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 205339
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/205339
ISSN: 0042-9686
PURE UUID: b324008e-a601-475c-ac1b-02dafcf51c9b
ORCID for J.A. Wright: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8842-2181

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Mar 2012 11:26
Last modified: 05 Nov 2019 01:49

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×