Men with broken condoms: who and why?
Men with broken condoms: who and why?
Objectives: To identify (1) the prevalence of condom breakage, and demographic and sexuality-related differences among young men who have sex with women reporting and not reporting this event; (2) condom-specific behaviours associated with breakage.
Methods: Young men (n?=?278) attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) responded to an anonymous questionnaire aided by a CD recording of the questions. The samples were screened to include only men who had used a condom during penile–vaginal sex at least three times in the past 3 months. Condom-specific behaviours (including breakage) were assessed using these last three acts of condom use as the recall period. Correlates achieving bivariate significance were subjected to multivariate analysis.
Results: Nearly one third (31.3%) of the men reported recent breakage. The breakage rate was 15%. Three correlates significantly distinguished between men who did and did not report breakage. Men who had past STIs were more likely to report breakage (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.08), as were men who also reported condom slippage (AOR 2.72). Less self-efficacy for correct condom use was also significantly associated with breakage (AOR 1.07). Further, three condom-specific behaviours were significantly associated with breakage: allowing condoms to contact sharp objects (AOR 2.6), experiencing problems with the “fit or feel” of condoms (AOR 2.3) and not squeezing air from the receptacle tip (AOR 2.0).
Conclusions: Breakage may be common and may occur in a larger context of difficulties with condoms. STI clinics could potentially benefit some men by providing instructions on the correct use of condoms.
71-75
Crosby, R.A.
0b06658b-f41c-4cb5-ad3b-cb74a6c0d025
Yarber, W.L.
4080671d-cfd7-4296-b3e2-2c87203cd739
Sanders, S.A.
ee62f688-1001-4976-824e-bd9cd7f523e6
Graham, C.A.
ac400331-f231-4449-a69b-ec9a477224c8
McBride, K.
3da329a6-b6ef-4e96-a546-65fc9ac7e5a1
Milhausen, R.R.
f79a950c-4c90-491c-b7f4-7d9c6e12caf6
Arno, J.N.
02181401-68b0-4b6c-944d-9e08249792cb
26 July 2006
Crosby, R.A.
0b06658b-f41c-4cb5-ad3b-cb74a6c0d025
Yarber, W.L.
4080671d-cfd7-4296-b3e2-2c87203cd739
Sanders, S.A.
ee62f688-1001-4976-824e-bd9cd7f523e6
Graham, C.A.
ac400331-f231-4449-a69b-ec9a477224c8
McBride, K.
3da329a6-b6ef-4e96-a546-65fc9ac7e5a1
Milhausen, R.R.
f79a950c-4c90-491c-b7f4-7d9c6e12caf6
Arno, J.N.
02181401-68b0-4b6c-944d-9e08249792cb
Crosby, R.A., Yarber, W.L., Sanders, S.A., Graham, C.A., McBride, K., Milhausen, R.R. and Arno, J.N.
(2006)
Men with broken condoms: who and why?
Sexually Transmitted Infections, 83 (1), .
(doi:10.1136/sti.2006.021154).
Abstract
Objectives: To identify (1) the prevalence of condom breakage, and demographic and sexuality-related differences among young men who have sex with women reporting and not reporting this event; (2) condom-specific behaviours associated with breakage.
Methods: Young men (n?=?278) attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) responded to an anonymous questionnaire aided by a CD recording of the questions. The samples were screened to include only men who had used a condom during penile–vaginal sex at least three times in the past 3 months. Condom-specific behaviours (including breakage) were assessed using these last three acts of condom use as the recall period. Correlates achieving bivariate significance were subjected to multivariate analysis.
Results: Nearly one third (31.3%) of the men reported recent breakage. The breakage rate was 15%. Three correlates significantly distinguished between men who did and did not report breakage. Men who had past STIs were more likely to report breakage (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.08), as were men who also reported condom slippage (AOR 2.72). Less self-efficacy for correct condom use was also significantly associated with breakage (AOR 1.07). Further, three condom-specific behaviours were significantly associated with breakage: allowing condoms to contact sharp objects (AOR 2.6), experiencing problems with the “fit or feel” of condoms (AOR 2.3) and not squeezing air from the receptacle tip (AOR 2.0).
Conclusions: Breakage may be common and may occur in a larger context of difficulties with condoms. STI clinics could potentially benefit some men by providing instructions on the correct use of condoms.
Text
Broken_Condoms_revised.doc
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Registered users only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 26 July 2006
Organisations:
Psychology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 206897
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/206897
ISSN: 1368-4973
PURE UUID: 46a6c60e-abb6-4e2a-80b0-e3467c7d437b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Jan 2012 16:36
Last modified: 21 Mar 2024 02:47
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
R.A. Crosby
Author:
W.L. Yarber
Author:
S.A. Sanders
Author:
K. McBride
Author:
R.R. Milhausen
Author:
J.N. Arno
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics