The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparison between visual analysis and microscope assessment of surgical instrument cleanliness from sterile service departments

Comparison between visual analysis and microscope assessment of surgical instrument cleanliness from sterile service departments
Comparison between visual analysis and microscope assessment of surgical instrument cleanliness from sterile service departments
Modern hospital sterile service departments (SSDs) routinely inspect instruments visually to assess the degree of contamination present after the washer/disinfector cycle.We aimed to test the effectiveness and reliability of this method. Surgical instrument sets were obtained from nine anonymous National Health Service (NHS) Primary Care Trust SSDs to investigate the efficacy of ‘in-place’ cleaning procedures. The instruments were first inspected visually, followed by a novel technique called episcopic differential interference contrast microscopy. This was combined with a sensitive fluorescent reagent, SYPRORuby, to rapidly visualise and assess contamination levels on the medical devices. The application of a Contamination Index (0e4) for both proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous deposits on the surface allowed quantitative assessment. Close correlation was seen for simple instruments between visual assessment and microscopic analysis. For more complex instruments,however, there was a marked difference between the two assessment techniques and the microscopy procedure showed areas of proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous crystalline soiling that was difficult or impossible to see by eye. Visual assessment of cleaning is fraught with possible error. This survey shows how large amounts of contamination could pass undetected using such antiquated methods. The new methodology applied in the assessment of surface contamination is rapid and generally applicable and could be used more widely for routine monitoring of instrument cleanliness.
sterile service departments, surgical instruments, contamination index, visual inspection, microscopy
0195-6701
52-58
Lipscomb, I.P.
bb93c4d9-33b7-4323-9e3c-8922d13994cc
Sihota, A.K.
1d65ef62-1da7-4e66-8bfa-78eeb7c287b9
Keevil, C.W.
cb7de0a7-ce33-4cfa-af52-07f99e5650eb
Lipscomb, I.P.
bb93c4d9-33b7-4323-9e3c-8922d13994cc
Sihota, A.K.
1d65ef62-1da7-4e66-8bfa-78eeb7c287b9
Keevil, C.W.
cb7de0a7-ce33-4cfa-af52-07f99e5650eb

Lipscomb, I.P., Sihota, A.K. and Keevil, C.W. (2008) Comparison between visual analysis and microscope assessment of surgical instrument cleanliness from sterile service departments. Journal of Hospital Infection, 68 (1), 52-58. (doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2007.08.009). (PMID:17942186)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Modern hospital sterile service departments (SSDs) routinely inspect instruments visually to assess the degree of contamination present after the washer/disinfector cycle.We aimed to test the effectiveness and reliability of this method. Surgical instrument sets were obtained from nine anonymous National Health Service (NHS) Primary Care Trust SSDs to investigate the efficacy of ‘in-place’ cleaning procedures. The instruments were first inspected visually, followed by a novel technique called episcopic differential interference contrast microscopy. This was combined with a sensitive fluorescent reagent, SYPRORuby, to rapidly visualise and assess contamination levels on the medical devices. The application of a Contamination Index (0e4) for both proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous deposits on the surface allowed quantitative assessment. Close correlation was seen for simple instruments between visual assessment and microscopic analysis. For more complex instruments,however, there was a marked difference between the two assessment techniques and the microscopy procedure showed areas of proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous crystalline soiling that was difficult or impossible to see by eye. Visual assessment of cleaning is fraught with possible error. This survey shows how large amounts of contamination could pass undetected using such antiquated methods. The new methodology applied in the assessment of surface contamination is rapid and generally applicable and could be used more widely for routine monitoring of instrument cleanliness.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 17 October 2007
Published date: 2008
Keywords: sterile service departments, surgical instruments, contamination index, visual inspection, microscopy
Organisations: Centre for Biological Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 209327
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/209327
ISSN: 0195-6701
PURE UUID: b165b86f-5afb-4539-91f3-1f8a5bf73ea4
ORCID for C.W. Keevil: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-7706

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Jan 2012 15:03
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:12

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: I.P. Lipscomb
Author: A.K. Sihota
Author: C.W. Keevil ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×