General framework for the identification of elastic constitutive parameters from full-field measurements
General framework for the identification of elastic constitutive parameters from full-field measurements
In this paper, several approaches available in the literature for identifying the constitutive parameters of linear elastic materials from full-field measurements are presented and their sensitivity to a white noise added to the data is compared.
The first investigated approach is the virtual fields method (VFM). It is shown that the uncertainty of the parameters identified with the VFM when a white noise is added to the data depends on the choice of a relevant set of virtual fields. Optimal virtual fields exist, thus minimizing the uncertainty and providing the ‘‘maximum likelihood solution’’. The other approaches investigated in this paper are based on finite element model updating (FEMU). It is proved that FEMU approaches actually
yield equations similar to the ones derived from the VFM, but with nonoptimal sets of virtual fields. Therefore, the
FEMU approaches do not provide the ‘‘maximum likelihood solution’’. However, the uncertainty of FEMU approaches
varies dramatically with the cost function to minimize. On one hand, the FEMU approach based on the ‘‘displacement
gap’’ minimization yields equations which are very close to the ones of the VFM approach and therefore, its uncertainty
is almost the same as the VFM one. On the other hand, it is shown that other approaches based on the ‘‘constitutive equation gap’’ minimization or the ‘‘equilibrium gap’’ minimization provide biased solutions. For all the approaches, very fast algorithms, converging in only two iterations, have been devised. They are finally applied to real experimental data obtained on an orthotropic composite material. Results confirm the success of two methods: the VFM approach which provides the ‘‘maximum likelihood solution’’ and the FEMU approach based on the ‘‘displacement gap’’ minimization.
4978-5002
Avril, S.
6c8490e9-2ae9-41c3-9bf8-bfbb3836c097
Pierron, F.
a1fb4a70-6f34-4625-bc23-fcb6996b79b4
July 2007
Avril, S.
6c8490e9-2ae9-41c3-9bf8-bfbb3836c097
Pierron, F.
a1fb4a70-6f34-4625-bc23-fcb6996b79b4
Avril, S. and Pierron, F.
(2007)
General framework for the identification of elastic constitutive parameters from full-field measurements.
International Journal of Solids and Structures, 44 (14-15), .
(doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.018).
Abstract
In this paper, several approaches available in the literature for identifying the constitutive parameters of linear elastic materials from full-field measurements are presented and their sensitivity to a white noise added to the data is compared.
The first investigated approach is the virtual fields method (VFM). It is shown that the uncertainty of the parameters identified with the VFM when a white noise is added to the data depends on the choice of a relevant set of virtual fields. Optimal virtual fields exist, thus minimizing the uncertainty and providing the ‘‘maximum likelihood solution’’. The other approaches investigated in this paper are based on finite element model updating (FEMU). It is proved that FEMU approaches actually
yield equations similar to the ones derived from the VFM, but with nonoptimal sets of virtual fields. Therefore, the
FEMU approaches do not provide the ‘‘maximum likelihood solution’’. However, the uncertainty of FEMU approaches
varies dramatically with the cost function to minimize. On one hand, the FEMU approach based on the ‘‘displacement
gap’’ minimization yields equations which are very close to the ones of the VFM approach and therefore, its uncertainty
is almost the same as the VFM one. On the other hand, it is shown that other approaches based on the ‘‘constitutive equation gap’’ minimization or the ‘‘equilibrium gap’’ minimization provide biased solutions. For all the approaches, very fast algorithms, converging in only two iterations, have been devised. They are finally applied to real experimental data obtained on an orthotropic composite material. Results confirm the success of two methods: the VFM approach which provides the ‘‘maximum likelihood solution’’ and the FEMU approach based on the ‘‘displacement gap’’ minimization.
Text
AvrilPierronReviseUnmarked.pdf
- Author's Original
Restricted to Registered users only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: July 2007
Organisations:
Engineering Mats & Surface Engineerg Gp
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 209497
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/209497
ISSN: 0020-7683
PURE UUID: 402b68f7-8e97-4add-9bb8-9c1a4dd724a6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 31 Jan 2012 12:27
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:35
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
S. Avril
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics